Re: [gmx-users] Thermostat for REMD simulations in implicit solvent

2010-11-26 Thread César Ávila
I also noticed this error on my setup, so I changed tau-t to 0.1, which is commonly found on others setup. tau-t = 0.0109 seems too low. 2010/11/26 Per Larsson > Hi! > > Have never tried remd with implicit solvent, but note that the unit of > tau-t in the mdp-file is ps, not ps-1. This means you

Re: [gmx-users] Thermostat for REMD simulations in implicit solvent

2010-11-26 Thread Per Larsson
Hi! Have never tried remd with implicit solvent, but note that the unit of tau-t in the mdp-file is ps, not ps-1. This means you should set tau-t = 0.0109 rather than 91. Try this and see if the problem goes away! /Per 26 nov 2010 kl. 15:55 skrev César Ávila : > Dear all, > I am trying to s

[gmx-users] Thermostat for REMD simulations in implicit solvent

2010-11-26 Thread César Ávila
Dear all, I am trying to set up a REMD simulation for a peptide (CHARMM ff) in implicit solvent (OBC GB). Following Bjelkmar et al* I am using stochastics dynamics integration with an inverse friction constant of 91 ps-1, 5 fs timestep, virtual-sites for hydrogens, all-vs-all nonbonded (no cutoff).