RE: [gmx-users] The right way of killing Gromacs

2006-09-15 Thread Berk Hess
From: kobi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: [gmx-users] The right way of killing Gromacs Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:33:27 +0200 Hello, the runtime of our cluster is unfortunately limited. Before md

Re: [gmx-users] The right way of killing Gromacs

2006-09-15 Thread Erik Lindahl
Hi, mdrun finishes on the next step when receiving TERM, and on the next multiple of nstxout when receiving USR1. On some systems, the USR1/SIGHUP is only sent to the parent MPI program, not the actual mdrun process, and then there isn't much we can do. In your case, try altering the si

[gmx-users] The right way of killing Gromacs

2006-09-15 Thread kobi
Hello, the runtime of our cluster is unfortunately limited. Before mdrun is terminated a USR1 signal is send, but this doesn't cause mdrun to writeout the current frame. Therefore most of the trajectory is lost. I'd like to write a skrip which converts the USR1 sinal to some other signal. The q