Re: [gmx-users] Reg: Standard error

2010-12-01 Thread Mark Abraham
On 1/12/2010 8:25 PM, vinothkumar mohanakrishnan wrote: Dear Mark Thank you for your explaination but Its not clear to me what you are trying to say. can you explain it bit more clearly. what should i need to do to get the standard error? any help is highly appreciated. Like I said, you need

Re: [gmx-users] Reg: Standard error

2010-12-01 Thread vinothkumar mohanakrishnan
Dear Mark Thank you for your explaination but Its not clear to me what you are trying to say. can you explain it bit more clearly. what should i need to do to get the standard error? any help is highly appreciated. Regards Vinoth On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Mark Abraham wrote: > On 1/12/201

Re: [gmx-users] Reg: Standard error

2010-12-01 Thread Mark Abraham
On 1/12/2010 7:59 PM, vinothkumar mohanakrishnan wrote: Hi Gromacians I am planning to compute the standard error for the interfacial surface tension of water-dichloro ethane. i just want to know is my procedure right. below is the result what i get from my g_energy command. Statistics over

[gmx-users] Reg: Standard error

2010-12-01 Thread vinothkumar mohanakrishnan
Hi Gromacians I am planning to compute the standard error for the interfacial surface tension of water-dichloro ethane. i just want to know is my procedure right. below is the result what i get from my g_energy command. Statistics over 51 steps [ 0. thru 1000.0001 ps ], 1 data sets All av