RE: [gmx-users] Re: scaling non-bonded interactions

2011-06-01 Thread Kukol, Andreas
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Vitaly Chaban [vvcha...@gmail.com] Sent: 01 June 2011 20:30 To: jalem...@vt.edu Cc: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: scaling non-bonded interactions Doesn't increased temperature work for

Re: [gmx-users] Re: scaling non-bonded interactions

2011-06-01 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Vitaly Chaban wrote: Doesn't increased temperature work for this purpose? REMD can be useful, yes, but generalized Hamiltonian exchange, using lambda to scale the interactions between molecules can be very effective, as well. -Justin On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Justin A. Lemkul w

Re: [gmx-users] Re: scaling non-bonded interactions

2011-06-01 Thread Vitaly Chaban
Doesn't increased temperature work for this purpose? On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > Vitaly Chaban wrote: >>> >>> Is it possible to globally scale all non-bonded interactions by a factor >>> ?  I know there are energy exclusion groups, but that is an all or nothing

Re: [gmx-users] Re: scaling non-bonded interactions

2011-06-01 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Vitaly Chaban wrote: Is it possible to globally scale all non-bonded interactions by a factor ? I know there are energy exclusion groups, but that is an all or nothing approach, while I would like to reduce non-bonded interaction potentials to e.g. 10% of their normal value. If this is not

[gmx-users] Re: scaling non-bonded interactions

2011-06-01 Thread Vitaly Chaban
> > Is it possible to globally scale all non-bonded interactions by a factor ?  I > know there are energy exclusion groups, but that is an all or nothing > approach, while I would like to reduce non-bonded interaction potentials to > e.g. 10% of their normal value. > > If this is not possible, I