Re: [gmx-users] Re: Simulation with CsCl

2010-06-09 Thread Ran Friedman
can someone > suggest in simple terms how to include these considering the person is > not an expert in this field. > Please help. > > -- > Sonali Dhindwal > > > --- On *Tue, 8/6/10, Vitaly Chaban //* wrote: > > > From: Vitaly Chaban > Subject: [gmx

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Simulation with CsCl

2010-06-09 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
nging, and standard molecular mechanics treatment of such species suffers from many limitations, which may or may not influence your results. -Justin Please help. -- Sonali Dhindwal --- On *Tue, 8/6/10, Vitaly Chaban //* wrote: From: Vitaly Chaban Subject: [gmx-users] Re: Simulation

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Simulation with CsCl

2010-06-09 Thread sonali dhindwal
expert in this field. Please help. -- Sonali Dhindwal --- On Tue, 8/6/10, Vitaly Chaban wrote: From: Vitaly Chaban Subject: [gmx-users] Re: Simulation with CsCl To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Date: Tuesday, 8 June, 2010, 9:03 PM > Hi all: > I am trying to simulate a polysaccharide in solut

[gmx-users] Re: Simulation with CsCl

2010-06-08 Thread Vitaly Chaban
> Hi all: > I am trying to simulate a polysaccharide in solution of water and CsCl, but > cesium is not parametrized in the gromacs 4. I am using the force > field GROMOS 96. > I have looked for the parameters of Cs+ in the OPLS Force field and I have > created 4 files: Cs.atp, Cs.itp, Csnb.itp and