[gmx-users] Re: Hamiltonian replica exchange umbrella sampling with gmx 4.6

2013-04-02 Thread Dejun Lin
Hi Micheal, Just to make sure I understand you correctly -- I can have 1 type of restraint, e.g., a harmonic potential between 2 groups defined by (k1, d1) where k1 is force constant and d1 is the equilibrium position. But I can't have 2 or more types of restraints like (k1,d1,k2,d2,...,kn,dn). Is

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Hamiltonian replica exchange umbrella sampling with gmx 4.6

2013-04-02 Thread Michael Shirts
Hi, Dejun- Right now, the vector of lambda parameters is simply vdw, coul, bonded, restraint, temperature. You can't have, say, 2 different coul vectors or two different restraint vectors for different restraints. But you can change any of these components. You define the vector manually by wri

[gmx-users] Re: Hamiltonian replica exchange umbrella sampling with gmx 4.6

2013-04-02 Thread Dejun Lin
Hi Michael, Do the codes now support walking in multidimensional parameter space? i.e., a state is defined by a set of lambda parameters {l1,l2,l3,...,ln} and a MC move is attempted along one of the parameter, which is randomly picked. Thanks, Dejun -- View this message in context: http://gro

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Hamiltonian replica exchange umbrella sampling with gmx 4.6

2013-03-08 Thread Michael Shirts
Great -- if it doesn't seem to be working the way it should after some playing around, then submit it as a redmine issue, and I'll take a look. On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Joakim Jämbeck wrote: > Dear Michael, > > Thank you for your reply. > > Yes, it is relatively clear now. Will try to play

[gmx-users] Re: Hamiltonian replica exchange umbrella sampling with gmx 4.6

2013-03-07 Thread Joakim Jämbeck
Dear Michael, Thank you for your reply. Yes, it is relatively clear now. Will try to play around with this later today. Best, Joakim > Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:55:31 -0500 > From: Michael Shirts > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Hamiltonian replica exchange umbrella > sampling with gmx 4.6 >