[gmx-users] Re: #include "ffXXX.itp"

2008-09-22 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Chih-Ying Lin wrote: so, [bonds] ; ai aj funct 8 9 gb_28 is correct... No. The function type is not the same as a bond type. Read in Chapter 5 about the difference. If you have atoms 8 and 9 as a bond, with the appropriate function type, the grompp will assign the values

[gmx-users] Re: #include "ffXXX.itp"

2008-09-22 Thread Chih-Ying Lin
Hi >From Justin: " Yes, as long as those atoms are listed as bonded within the [ bonds ] section of your .top file. " The specific "bonded function", such as gb_28", should be also listed on the [bonds] section, right? Or, it could assign NOTHING for me, right? so, [bonds] ; ai aj funct 8

[gmx-users] RE: #include "ffXXX.itp"

2008-09-22 Thread Vitaly Chaban
> How does this command automatically assign the force field > parameters which I did not assign in my .top file? It inserts the content of ffXXX.itp into .top file. -- Vitaly V. Chaban School of Chemistry National University of Kharkiv Svoboda sq.,4, Kharkiv 61077, Ukraine email: [EMAIL PROT

[gmx-users] Re: #include "ffXXX.itp"

2008-09-22 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Chih-Ying Lin wrote: HI The command #include "ffXXX.itp" is putting in the .top file. How does this command automatically assign the force field parameters which I did not assign in my .top file? Is it based on the atom types which I assign in my .top file? Then, all the force field pa

[gmx-users] RE: #include "ffXXX.itp"

2008-09-22 Thread Vitaly Chaban
> I want to print out the complete force field paramters which the command > "#include "ffXXX.itp" assigned. Goto /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ on your system. If the parameters mentioned in ffXXX.itp are redefined in your .top you get a warning by grompp. -- Vitaly V. Chaban School of