Hi,
No there were no dummies, and without changing the masses in the
non-bonded parameters file it would give infinite velocities.
Regards
Maik Goette wrote:
Hi
I never had to change masses in the nb.itp and I ran lots of
simulations with the amber-Port...Are you sure, that you had no
d
Hi
I never had to change masses in the nb.itp and I ran lots of simulations
with the amber-Port...Are you sure, that you had no dummies with mass
zero or so?
REgards
Maik Goette, Dipl. Biol.
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Theoretical & computational biophysics department
Am F
Hi,
Actually I think that although the .atp file seems to be used, the
masses in the ffamberxxnb.itp file must be changed from the zero values
to the correct ones: when I ran a simulation without changing them I got
infinite velocities and which did nor happen when I changed the masses
to
Maik Goette wrote:
David
I think, I should not contradict to one of the developers, but if your
statement is true:
1. Where, in fact, are the masses coming from (the masses in the amberFF
port can only be found in the atp, as far as I know)?
2. Why does GROMACS complain about missing atoms in
David
I think, I should not contradict to one of the developers, but if your
statement is true:
1. Where, in fact, are the masses coming from (the masses in the amberFF
port can only be found in the atp, as far as I know)?
2. Why does GROMACS complain about missing atoms in the atp-file, if I
Maik Goette wrote:
Because it is?
The masses are defined in the .atp file. I dont't know how GROMACS
handles the stuff, but that is sufficiantMaybe Eric was a bit lazy...
Why do you care for that...?
atp file is never used...
Maik Goette, Dipl. Biol.
Max Planck Institute for Biophysic
Because it is?
The masses are defined in the .atp file. I dont't know how GROMACS
handles the stuff, but that is sufficiantMaybe Eric was a bit lazy...
Why do you care for that...?
Maik Goette, Dipl. Biol.
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Theoretical & computational biophysic
Hello,
I have a question regarding DNA simulation.
I have the amber99 package.
Can anyone give me an explanation why all the masses in the
ffamberXXnb.itpare 0?
Thank you very much!
Bo
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.groma
I am not sure if you read my previous reply here:
http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2007-May/027730.html
To be more explicit... you made a spelling mistake. "-D" is a flag and
"FLEXIBLE" is what you are defining. You put an "E" between the two.
Remove it. If that doesn't fix the proble
Hi,
As I mentioned in my last message, I also use pymol to visualize the
molecule with water. I realize that the very top part of the DNA molecule
is not surrounded by water molecules. I tried to varying the value for -d.
Do you have any suggestions?
Cheers~
Bo
___
Hi everyone,
I am still lost. For the DNA simulation that I am doing, I really don't know
what is wrong. Is the em.mdp file (maybe temperature or other settings)
inappropriate?
Can you give me more specified explanation?
Regards!
Bo
___
gmx-users maili
Yes you need -DFLEXIBLE because you can't use constraints with em. Settle is a
constraint for water.
You problem is here:
define =-DEFLEXIBLE
-DEFLEXIBLE is not equal to -DFLEXIBLE
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http:
Hi,
When I do the DNA MD simulation. I use pdb2gmx, and the water model I used
is spc.gro.
I did the editconf and genbox. The following is my em.mdp file.
define =-DEFLEXIBLE
integrator =
13 matches
Mail list logo