On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
> Why? To avoid refining and extrapolating 100 tables for a Coarse grained
> run and use constants instead...
I'd still think writing the script in your language of choice to write out
the tables is a much lighter weight proposition than se
Why? To avoid refining and extrapolating 100 tables for a Coarse grained
run and use constants instead... And to make it faster obviously.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> No. You're modifying the C code, so you will have to learn to maintain
> a GROMACS installation. Yet a
No. You're modifying the C code, so you will have to learn to maintain
a GROMACS installation. Yet another reason to avoid modifying the C
code :-)
Mark
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
> I will speak to someone who is familiar with the code. However, my Gromacs
> version
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Steven Neumann > >wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 6/10/13 5:16 AM, Steven Neumann w
I will speak to someone who is familiar with the code. However, my Gromacs
version is installed on the cluster, can I create a file in my directory
which will use this code with a given potential?
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Mar
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Steven Neumann >wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/10/13 5:16 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thank you.
> > >> Do you know whether it is poss
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Steven Neumann wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 6/10/13 5:16 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you.
> >> Do you know whether it is possible to use the 5th order polynomial for
> >> angles in Gromacs? I know I c
On 6/18/13 11:39 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 6/10/13 5:16 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
Thank you.
Do you know whether it is possible to use the 5th order polynomial for
angles in Gromacs? I know I can use tables but wish to fit my data
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 6/10/13 5:16 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
>
>> Thank you.
>> Do you know whether it is possible to use the 5th order polynomial for
>> angles in Gromacs? I know I can use tables but wish to fit my data into
>> such a function.
>>
>>
> No
The constant angle has a weird units of kJ /mol rad^n while the angle is in
degrees. Does not make sense but at least I know where I made a mistake...
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 6/12/13 10:01 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
>
>> Dear Gmx Users,
>>
>> I run a simul
On 6/12/13 10:01 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
Dear Gmx Users,
I run a simulation with quartic angle potential. These function has two
minima at 100 at 120 degrees. However, seems from my simulation that it is
not applied... all angles are around 180 degrees and my chain is a line
chain (straight)
Dear Gmx Users,
I run a simulation with quartic angle potential. These function has two
minima at 100 at 120 degrees. However, seems from my simulation that it is
not applied... all angles are around 180 degrees and my chain is a line
chain (straight).
I have in my topology
[ angles ]
; i j k
On 6/10/13 5:16 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
Thank you.
Do you know whether it is possible to use the 5th order polynomial for
angles in Gromacs? I know I can use tables but wish to fit my data into
such a function.
Nothing in the manual seems to suggest that such a form is supported.
-Justin
Thank you.
Do you know whether it is possible to use the 5th order polynomial for
angles in Gromacs? I know I can use tables but wish to fit my data into
such a function.
Steven
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 6/5/13 8:40 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
>
>> Dear Gmx Us
On 6/5/13 8:40 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
Dear Gmx Users,
I wish to use quartic angle potential and specify all constants. I know it
is a function 6 of [ angles ] but do not know how to place my polynomial
constants?
As table 5.5 in the manual indicates, list the equilibrium angle followed b
Dear Gmx Users,
I wish to use quartic angle potential and specify all constants. I know it
is a function 6 of [ angles ] but do not know how to place my polynomial
constants?
Thank you,
Steven
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-user
16 matches
Mail list logo