could be that in the meantime something broke because of
changes in the pme code .
Berk
> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 03:35:30 -0400
> From: kd...@princeton.edu
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Subject: [gmx-users] Problem with PME + test particle insertion
>
> Hello Gromacs users,
&
Hello Gromacs users,
Recently I ran some test particle insertion simulations of TIP4P/2005
water to measure the chemical potential at 470 K and 0.861 g/cc. I
found that the chemical potential was 20%-25% higher than literature
values. I believe there may be a problem related to using PME with
te
2 matches
Mail list logo