[gmx-users] PMF in vacuum and pull direction

2010-06-08 Thread chris . neale
Dear Eudes: Thanks for working with me on this one! What you are getting is actually what you are asking for in your .mdp file. You restrain the Z-projection of the displacement, but do not affect the X and Y components of the displacement with pull_dim = N N Y. If you want to pull with s

[gmx-users] PMF in vacuum and pull direction (chris.ne...@utoronto.ca)

2010-06-08 Thread Eudes Fileti
4. PMF in vacuum and pull direction (chris.ne...@utoronto.ca) > > > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:14:34 -0400 > From: chris.ne...@utoronto.ca > Subject: [gmx-users] PMF in vacuum and pull direction > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org > Message-ID: <20100608121434.u6rhqhz400

[gmx-users] PMF in vacuum and pull direction

2010-06-08 Thread chris . neale
ate1 = 0.001 pull_k1 = 1600 Message: 4 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:05:23 -0400 From: chris.neale at utoronto.ca Subject: [gmx-users] PMF in vacuum and pull direction To: gmx-users at gromacs.org Message-ID: <20100608080523.i6oo62he1wwc0wkg at webmail.utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain

[gmx-users] PMF in vacuum and pull direction (chris.ne...@utoronto.ca)

2010-06-08 Thread Eudes Fileti
im = N N Y pull_start = yes pull_ngroups = 1 pull_group0 = BEN1 pull_group1 = BEN2 pull_vec1 = 0 0 1 pull_rate1 = 0.001 pull_k1 = 1600 > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:05:23 -0400 > From: chris.ne...@utoronto.ca > Subject: [gmx-users] PMF in vacuum and pull direction >

[gmx-users] PMF in vacuum and pull direction

2010-06-08 Thread chris . neale
2010 12:12:03 -0400 From: chris.ne...@utoronto.ca Subject: [gmx-users] PMF in vacuum To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Message-ID: <20100527121203.orb2sq228s4ow...@webmail.utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Dear

[gmx-users] PMF in vacuum and pull direction (chris.ne...@utoronto.ca)

2010-06-08 Thread Eudes Fileti
man) > 4. vibrational spectra of glucose (Nilesh Dhumal) > > > -- > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 12:12:03 -0400 > From: chris.ne...@utoronto.ca > Subject: [gmx-users] PMF in vacuum > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org > Message-ID: <20100

[gmx-users] PMF in vacuum

2010-05-27 Thread chris . neale
Dear Eudes: To answer your pbc vs no-pbc question, I suggest that you use pbc=no and set nstlist=0 rlist=0 rvdw=0 rcoulomb=0 so that you calculate all interactions in direct space with no cutoffs. ## Major comments that you should still investigate 1. There is no need to use a virtual atom,

[gmx-users] PMF in vacuum

2010-05-25 Thread chris . neale
Dear Eudes: Can you please elaborate on your description? What .mdp options are you using? What exactly do your curves look like (you can post pictures to photobucket or some other online service and link them here)? If you suspect that you are doing something wrong, then we need to under

[gmx-users] PMF in vacuum

2010-05-25 Thread Eudes Fileti
Hi gmx-users, I'm trying to simulate a umbrella sampling PMF between two benzene molecules in vacuum. My protocol is working fine, my histograms have good overlap and the curves I have got are quite reasonable. However I have noticed that some options in my .mdp file can significantly change the d