Am I wrong, or are you considering some kind of MSCG (which is not into
gromacs at least in a standard, straight forward out of the box way)? That's
nice, would be really interesting to implement, would take long time and is
still a relativelly open-field with lot to be still explored.
I think we
On Feb 3, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Elton Carvalho wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:50 PM, XAvier Periole
wrote:
-No: is where you can find much more arguments. First of all the
two force
fields have not
been parametrized consistently. Second you'll probalby have
problems in
defining the
interac
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:50 PM, XAvier Periole wrote:
> -No: is where you can find much more arguments. First of all the two force
> fields have not
> been parametrized consistently. Second you'll probalby have problems in
> defining the
> interactions between the two approches. How the protein wi
On Feb 2, 2009, at 10:19 PM, DAVID RINCON wrote:
Good afternoon,
The reason of this email is to ask:
is it possible to combine Martini's force field with the opls force
field?
The system is conformed by dopc membrane [Modeled by Martini's force
field] with a small molecule of about 50 a
Good afternoon,
The reason of this email is to ask:
is it possible to combine Martini's force field with the opls force field?
The system is conformed by dopc membrane [Modeled by Martini's force field]
with a small molecule of about 50 atoms [Modeled with opls. With all its
hydrogens].
if th
5 matches
Mail list logo
