On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Vasilii Artyukhov wrote:
Hi,
Anybody have any real-world comparisons of using MKL vs. FFTW3?
[ http://www.quantumespresso.org/user_guide/node16.html
]http://www.quantumespresso.org/user_guide/node16.html says:
Axel Kohlmeyer suggests the following (April 2008): "(I've) f
ver result in a significant
performance loss.
Berk
From: darth.va...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:08:48 +0400
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs using MKL with Intel 11.1 compilers
To: cous...@umit.maine.edu; gmx-users@gromacs.org
CC:
Hi,
Anybody have any real-world comparisons of us
Hi,
> Anybody have any real-world comparisons of using MKL vs. FFTW3?
>
http://www.quantumespresso.org/user_guide/node16.html says:
Axel Kohlmeyer suggests the following (April 2008): "(I've) found that Intel
is now turning on multithreading without any warning and that is for example
why their
Steve Cousins wrote:
I just thought I'd mention some troubles and fixes I had with trying to
get Gromacs 4.0.5 to configure with --with-fft=mkl on a SGI Altix 3700
BX2 system. I did:
export CC=icc
export F77=ifort
export CFLAGS="-O3 -ip -ftz"
export FFLAGS="-O3 -ip -ftz"
export LDFLAGS="-O3
I just thought I'd mention some troubles and fixes I had with trying to
get Gromacs 4.0.5 to configure with --with-fft=mkl on a SGI Altix 3700
BX2 system. I did:
export CC=icc
export F77=ifort
export CFLAGS="-O3 -ip -ftz"
export FFLAGS="-O3 -ip -ftz"
export LDFLAGS="-O3 -ip -ftz -L/opt/intel
5 matches
Mail list logo