Re: [gmx-users] Format of a Topology File When Using Amber FF in Gromacs

> [Question 1] The topology file produced by pdb2gmx with Amber FF > (ffamber03, for example) looked different from what we used to obtain with > ffG43a1. > > No force constants were assigned in [ bonds ], [ angles ], [ dihedrals ], > etc. That's because they're being read from ffamber03bon.itp b

Re: [gmx-users] Format of a Topology File When Using Amber FF in Gromacs

한상화 wrote: > Dear Gromacs users, > > > > I have successfully installed Amber FF in Gromacs according to the > instruction by the Pande Group (http://folding.stanford.edu/ffamber/). > > I ran a demo successfully and enjoyed the speed of Gromacs. > > My questions are: > > [Question 1] The top

[gmx-users] Format of a Topology File When Using Amber FF in Gromacs

Dear Gromacs users, I have successfully installed Amber FF in Gromacs according to the instruction by the Pande Group (http://folding.stanford.edu/ffamber/). I ran a demo successfully and enjoyed the speed of Gromacs. My questions are: [Question 1] The topology file produced by pdb2gmx with