. In addition, difference in simply looking at domain changes in proteins or affinites, etc...
Gesendet: Montag, 12. August 2013 um 14:19 Uhr
Von: "Maria Astón Serrano"
An: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Betreff: [gmx-users] Force Field for peptides and proteins
Dear Gromacs users,
We would like t
On this note, I wanted to ask about simulated unfolding of proteins. I have
a primarily alpha-helical-protein ( about 300 amino acids, 5 alpha helices,
no beta strands) and 3 of its single point mutants. Now, to answer the
question of relative stability, I want to place them in a water bath and
hea
On 8/12/13 8:19 AM, Maria Astón Serrano wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
We would like to know which is the Force Field which is customarily
preferred for simulations of peptides and proteins.
Interestingly, this same question was just asked on the development list,
although the discussion indee
I like CHARMM.
Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Maria Astón Serrano <
m.aston.serr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Gromacs users,
>
> We would like to know which is the Force Field which is customarily
> preferred for simulations of peptides and proteins.
>
> Thank you very muc
It depends on what properties of peptides and proteins that you want to
explore.
~Thu
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Maria Astón Serrano <
m.aston.serr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Gromacs users,
>
> We would like to know which is the Force Field which is customarily
> preferred for simulation
Dear Gromacs users,
We would like to know which is the Force Field which is customarily
preferred for simulations of peptides and proteins.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Maria
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please s
6 matches
Mail list logo