Re: [gmx-users] CVS support for threads [was: qm_mopac.c problems in building of 3.3.1]

2006-10-11 Thread Erik Lindahl
Hi, On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Anton Feenstra wrote: Nevertheless, on newer architectures, threads would ultimately be the better choice. They're working on it and according to David van der Spoel it will be in 4.0 (that was on the Developer's list in May '04... Br, as David would p

Re: [gmx-users] CVS support for threads [was: qm_mopac.c problems in building of 3.3.1]

2006-10-11 Thread Anton Feenstra
Jake Michaelson wrote: Another problem I've run into (this is OT) is the '--enable-threads' option. I know (from other mailing list posts) that this doesn't work in any of the releases, but how about CVS? If it doesn't work, why include the option in the configure script? It seems like with t