using? cMAP is implemented in v4.5 or
>> later
>> Jianguo
>>
>> --
>> *From:* César Ávila
>> *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users
>> *Sent:* Sunday, 9 October 2011 12:07 AM
>> *Subject:* [gmx-users] CMAP for alanine dipeptide in Charmm27 ff
>
Jianguo
*From:* César Ávila mailto:clav...@gmail.com>>
*To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
*Sent:* Sunday, 9 October 2011 12:07 AM
*Subject:* [gmx-users] CMAP for alanine dipeptide in
After checking the topology of my peptide, I found that every term in the cMAP
section involve three consecutive residues. So I guess no cMAP term is required
for di-ALA.
Jianguo
--- On Mon, 10/10/11, César Ávila wrote:
From: César Ávila
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] CMAP for alanine
MAP is implemented in v4.5 or later
> Jianguo
>
> --
> *From:* César Ávila
> *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users
> *Sent:* Sunday, 9 October 2011 12:07 AM
> *Subject:* [gmx-users] CMAP for alanine dipeptide in Charmm27 ff
>
> I would like
which gromacs version are you using? cMAP is implemented in v4.5 or later
Jianguo
From: César Ávila
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Sunday, 9 October 2011 12:07 AM
Subject: [gmx-users] CMAP for alanine dipeptide in Charmm27 ff
I would like to
I would like to run REMD simulations on the alanine dipeptide using the
Charmm27ff + CMAP. Still, after processing the pdb with pdb2gmx, I do not
see any entrance referring to the cmap term in the topology file. Does this
mean that Cmap won't be calculated?
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@g
6 matches
Mail list logo