On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:33 +0200, David van der Spoel wrote:
> >>> Explanation: I am working on a package of Gromacs 4 that is going
> to be
> >>> included in Fedora. Is there still a need to have a separate package for
> >>> Gromacs 3.3.x or is just Gromacs 4 enough?
> >> Gromacs 4.0 can read all
Hi,
The latest version is not officially out though.
We expect the official release very soon.
When do you need it?
Berk
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Binary compatibility Gromacs 3.x <-> 4.0
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:30:03
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:27 +0200, David van der Spoel wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
are GROMACS 4.0 files binary compatible with GROMACS 3.(3.)x files?
Explanation: I am working on a package of Gromacs 4 that is going to be
included in Fedora. Is there still a need to
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:27 +0200, David van der Spoel wrote:
> Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > are GROMACS 4.0 files binary compatible with GROMACS 3.(3.)x files?
> >
> > Explanation: I am working on a package of Gromacs 4 that is going to be
> > included in Fedora. Is there still a ne
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
are GROMACS 4.0 files binary compatible with GROMACS 3.(3.)x files?
Explanation: I am working on a package of Gromacs 4 that is going to be
included in Fedora. Is there still a need to have a separate package for
Gromacs 3.3.x or is just Gromacs 4 enough?
Gromacs 4.0
Hi,
are GROMACS 4.0 files binary compatible with GROMACS 3.(3.)x files?
Explanation: I am working on a package of Gromacs 4 that is going to be
included in Fedora. Is there still a need to have a separate package for
Gromacs 3.3.x or is just Gromacs 4 enough?
--
6 matches
Mail list logo