Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-30 Thread Shima Arasteh
Dear Peter, I appreciate your explanation  :)  Regards, Shima - Original Message - From: Peter C. Lai To: Shima Arasteh Cc: Discussion list for GROMACS users Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 8:57 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid 323 is proper for a higher melting point lipid

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-30 Thread Peter C. Lai
cerely, > Shima > > > - Original Message - > From: Peter C. Lai > To: Shima Arasteh ; Discussion list for GROMACS > users > Cc: > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:54 PM > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid > > yes > http://www.frontiersin.org/B

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-30 Thread Shima Arasteh
that their study was done in mammalian cells. Is this the reason of this T? They mean 37 centigrades. Right?   Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Justin A. Lemkul To: Shima Arasteh ; Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 7:15 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-30 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 6/30/12 11:03 AM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Thanks Justin. Yes, you are right. You wrote the tutorial for DPPC and I know that. ok, I saw the temperatures upper than 271 K is proper for POPC. It's acceptable that 310 mentioned in Peter's paper is correct. But I'm wondering how they chose "310"

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-30 Thread Shima Arasteh
e, he explains that their study was done in mammalian cells.   Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Justin A. Lemkul To: Shima Arasteh ; Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 7:15 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid On 6/30/12 10:33 AM, Sh

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-30 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
in advance Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Peter C. Lai To: Shima Arasteh ; Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:54 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid yes http://www.frontiersin.org/Bioinformatics_and_Computational_Biology/10.3389/fgene.2012.00061

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-30 Thread Shima Arasteh
ers are not the same as your system . Would you telling me about the reason of 310 K? Thanks in advance   Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Peter C. Lai To: Shima Arasteh ; Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:54 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-user

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-29 Thread Shima Arasteh
Dear Peter, Thanks a lot :)   Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Peter C. Lai To: Shima Arasteh ; Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:54 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid yes http://www.frontiersin.org

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-29 Thread Peter C. Lai
er > > > > > Sincerely, > Shima > > > > From: Peter Lai > To: Discussion list for GROMACS users > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 7:14 AM > Subject: RE: [gmx-users] Berger lipid > > Uh didn't we go through all of thi

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-29 Thread Shima Arasteh
Dear Thomas, It's a good idea. Thanks :)   Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Thomas Piggot To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 1:39 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid Hi Shima, The lipids.rtp file in the charmm36.ff folder has

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-29 Thread Thomas Piggot
t for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid On 6/28/12 8:54 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Yes, I know that as studied the Kalp15 tutorial. Sorry, the last question :) : DO I need to run pdb2gmx to get the top file of POPC in CHARMM36? Is it ok? Because I see that POPC.itp is also require

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Shima Arasteh
: [gmx-users] Berger lipid Uh didn't we go through all of this like more than a month ago? I published a paper using C36 POPC and even a linked to my popc.itp for it on this list... Of course Shima is welcome to pdb2gmx his own POPC, which I am fairly certain will result in an identical

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Shima Arasteh
ckage in lipidbook too. Thanks Peter Sincerely, Shima From: Peter Lai To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 7:14 AM Subject: RE: [gmx-users] Berger lipid Uh didn't we go through all of this like more than a month ago? I p

[gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Christopher Neale
__ From: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org [gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org] on behalf of Justin A. Lemkul [jalemkul at vt.edu] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:56 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid On 6/28/12 8:54 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: > Y

RE: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Peter Lai
[gmx-users] Berger lipid On 6/28/12 8:54 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: > Yes, I know that as studied the Kalp15 tutorial. > Sorry, the last question :) > : > >DO I need to run pdb2gmx to get the top file of POPC in CHARMM36? Is it > ok? Because I see that POPC.itp is also req

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 6/28/12 8:54 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Yes, I know that as studied the Kalp15 tutorial. Sorry, the last question :) : DO I need to run pdb2gmx to get the top file of POPC in CHARMM36? Is it ok? Because I see that POPC.itp is also required for simulation of protein in bilayer. You ne

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Shima Arasteh
Message - From: Justin A. Lemkul To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 5:16 AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid On 6/28/12 8:43 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: > > > Yes, I have studied the article by Jeffery B. Klauda and other articles > re

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 6/28/12 8:43 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Yes, I have studied the article by Jeffery B. Klauda and other articles related to C36. And know where the parameters of CHARMM36 were derived. By the way, when I search the lipidbook to find the .itp file I can't find it! What about the lipid .itp

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Shima Arasteh
orial it's written "lipid.itp - Berger lipid parameters" ) Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Justin A. Lemkul To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 4:58 AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid On 6/28/12 8:23 PM, Shima Ara

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 6/28/12 8:23 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Thanks. Yes, you told me this before CHARMM36 is better than CHARMM27. But I'm afraid of using C36. Because I think it's a newer FF and and less studies have done by it. Then if I face a problem, I can't find a way through articles! Don't you think s

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Shima Arasteh
ima - Original Message - From: Justin A. Lemkul To: Shima Arasteh ; Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 4:46 AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid On 6/28/12 8:15 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to simulate a protein in POPC b

Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 6/28/12 8:15 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Hi all, I want to simulate a protein in POPC bilayer by CHARMM27 FF. I know phospholipids and protein are defined well in CHARMM27. Is Berger lipid required ? No, these are different force fields entirely. The CHARMM36 parameter set is better for

[gmx-users] Berger lipid

2012-06-28 Thread Shima Arasteh
Hi all, I want to simulate a protein in POPC bilayer by CHARMM27 FF. I know phospholipids and protein are defined well in CHARMM27. Is Berger lipid required ?   Thanks for your replies in advance. Sincerely, Shima -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailm