On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:31:39 +0200
xiaojing gong wrote:
> Hi, many thanks for your answer.
>
> >> Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether
> >> this
> means anything is another question.
>
> I am just wondering whether the structures you find with MD determined
> mainly
On 26/09/2011 6:25 PM, xiaojing gong wrote:
Hi, many thanks.
I am doing some simulation correlated with the growth, in experiments,
there are two kinds of growth, one is driven by kinetics and other is
by thermodynamics.
To address this question, I think you need to seek a better description
Hi, many thanks.
I am doing some simulation correlated with the growth, in experiments, there
are two kinds of growth, one is driven by kinetics and other is by
thermodynamics. So I just wonder to know by using MD simulations, the
results I obtained is driven by kinetics or thermodynamics.
Silly
On 26/09/2011 5:31 PM, xiaojing gong wrote:
Hi, many thanks for your answer.
>> Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether
this means anything is another question.
I am just wondering whether the structures you find with MD determined
mainly by thermodynamics (i.e. th
Hi, many thanks for your answer.
>> Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether this
means anything is another question.
I am just wondering whether the structures you find with MD determined
mainly by thermodynamics (i.e. the lowest energy structures) or by kinetics
(i.e.
On 26/09/2011 6:41 AM, xiaojing gong wrote:
Dear all,
A question about, in MD, in which situation you can obtain a structure
with lowest energy.
Any dynamical simulation has a lowest-energy structure... whether this
means anything is another question.
Can MD simulate the kinetics process, a
Dear all,
A question about, in MD, in which situation you can obtain a
structure with lowest energy.
Can MD simulate the kinetics process, and obtain a stuctrue with the
lowest activation barriers?
Typically, are the structures we find with MD determined mainly by
thermodyn
Also see
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Thermostats
As you do not want to temperature couple the sodium ions independently
Tom
--On Tuesday, September 11, 2007 18:14:43 +1000 Mark Abraham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
amri ta wrote:
Dear colleagues,
I am simulating a phosphorylated prote
Hi Amrita,
I have faced similar problem.before MD run, try to
minimize water box and protein seperately with both CG
and SD, then put protein in the water box and minimize
it again .., then go for MD run, I think after that
you dont have any Lincs warning..
Chiradip
--- amri ta <[EMAIL PROTEC
Dear colleagues,
I am simulating a phosphorylated protein embedded in waterbox. When I try
running mdrun, I get a LINCS warning.
Does this mean that I have go back to the CG-EM step and use the double
precision libs?
The md.log file reads:
Initializing LINear Constraint Solver
number of constr
amri ta wrote:
Dear colleagues,
I am simulating a phosphorylated protein embedded in waterbox.
When I try running mdrun, I get a LINCS warning.
Does this mean that I have go back to the CG-EM step and use the double
precision libs?
These should help.
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Err
Dear colleagues,
I am simulating a phosphorylated protein embedded in waterbox.
When I try running mdrun, I get a LINCS warning.
Does this mean that I have go back to the CG-EM step and use the double
precision libs?
The md.log file reads:
...
Initializing LINear Constraint Solver
number
12 matches
Mail list logo