Hi Tsjerk,
You are absolutely right! :-)
Thanks for your help!
Regards,
Maki Yoshisawa
Celebrate Yahoo! JAPAN 10th Anniversary
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)
Hi!
I am not quite sure I have understood the way the ASCII version of the covariance matrix (-ASCII option of g_covar) has been constructed...
In my test system I have 3 atoms - this will give a 9X9 cov. matrix.
In the help of g_covar the order the covar.dat file is:
first row: x1x1 x1y1 x1z1
se
Dear David,
thank you ver much!
As a matter of fact, g_angle (3.3) is working perfectly well! It was a stupid error of mine!!
Sorry for the inconvenience...
Best wishes!
Maki Yoshizawa
Celebrate Yahoo! JAPAN 10th Anniversary
___
gmx-users mailing l
Dear David,
thank you very much for your reply!
Indeed I have used -type dihedral.
Could it be, the problem lies in the [].tpr and [].xtc files? I mean, which subset of atoms must I choose in those files? (This very part of the previous discussion was obscure to me!)
Best wishes!
Maki Yoshiza
Hello,
I would like to use PCA analysis in the dihedral space.
Despite having read the topics related to this issue in the GROMACS page I am not quite sure how to accomplish this :-)
The -or option in the g_angle (version 3.3) seems not to be working. I am already using an index file as sugested i
5 matches
Mail list logo