Could someone clarify the form of the 10-4 potential function used in
GROMACS walls? Is it really 10-4, and not 10-4-3?
We have tried to create our own 10-4 potential using tables but it doesn't
match the results of the built-in GROMACS wall type.
___
g
Just wanting to confirm:
The potential function for the 10-4 wall in GROMACS is of the form:
VLJ = c12*density*pi/(5*r^10) - c6*density*pi/(2*r^4)
It is NOT the same as the 10-4-3 function which is also sometimes used to
model surface-fluid interactions?
Thanks, Travis T.
_
We are using version 3.3. We switched over to 4.0.2 but encountered the
'hanging' problem mentioned by Patrick Fuchs and others and went back. Our
version of MPI LAM is 7.1.2. We'll try using openMPI and see if that
allows GMX 4.0.2 to run okay.
By using gmxdump on our .tpr file, we figured out wh
Our minimization ended with a large net force on "atom 0." Since there is
no atom 0 in our .gro, .top, or .ndx files, is mdrun re-numbering the
atoms in our system according to some scheme, or is this an indication
that something very wrong is happening?
-Travis Trudeau, MSc. student at University
Is there a way within GROMACS to use both Buckingham and Lennard-Jones
potentials in the same simulation? So for example water-water could be
modelled with LJ and water-solute with Buckingham?
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://ww
5 matches
Mail list logo