Dear all,
I want to know if someone has had the same problem as me. I am running AFM
calculations. when trying to plot the data from the pdo file, I can see
that the coordinates are not fixed for jumps!
The pulled group coordinates sometimes stay the same while the Reference
and spring coordinate
Dear gromacs users,
I would like to obtain a potential of mean force (PMF) plot from an AFM
Pulling calculation.
I used AFM method in the Pull code to separate two strands of peptides
along their center of mass reaction coordinate.
here is the parameters I used:
runtype = afm
ngroups = 1
referen
Hello Janne,
this is what I usually do when my molecules cross the box or dance all
around and it works for me:
I first do this with the "original" unmodified or fitted xtc or trr file:
trjconv -f -o -pbc nojump
then i take the modified trr or xtc and do a fit:
trjconv -f -s -fit rot+trans
Hi Maik,
Thank you for the answer. I still have some questions.
I still didn't get the umberalla sampling method. It seems to me AFM and
umberalla are the same except that in umberalla we dont define a Pull
rate. Looking at the literature, people have been using umberalla method
with discrete sim
Dear all,
I have been reading the literature, mailing list and the manual.
There is some questions that I cant understand:
1) there is three methods for the pull code: constraint force, AFM and
umberalla.
in both AFM and Constraint force, there is an option of the rate of
pulling (contraint_rat
Thank you David and Arneh for the comments.
I just have a couple of things i want to clarify about the constrain
distances i used. The distance I used to pull the ligand and receptor
apart was a non-bonded distance between the amide nitrogen of the ligand
and the oxygen carbonyl of the receptor (
Thank you for the reply,
Sorry for the confusion of my two emails. I guess I was using the word
"pulling" in the wrong context. Now after my extensive reading, what I
meant is that i want to calculate the absoulte binding free energy of a
ligand/receptor complex.
I have read the manual over and
Hello,
I have tried using the mdrun_mpi and it can't run. It gives me this error:
Failed to find the following executable:
Executable: mdrun_mpi
Cannot continue.
Belquis
>
>
>> I ran this command for Parellel calculation:
>>
>> mpirun -np 2 mdrun -deffnm filename
>
> did you try the follow
Hi,
I am not the one who built it, but it is MPI supported.
> Have your built the GROMACS with MPI-support?
>
> Regards,
> Yang Ye
>
> On 8/1/2007 4:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Dear Gromacs users,
>>
>> I am trying to do Parellel calculations using Gromacs on a Rocks
>> cluster
>> that
Dear Gromacs users,
I am trying to do Parellel calculations using Gromacs on a Rocks cluster
that has MPI enabled.
Has anybody encountered the following error:
Program mdrun, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: init.c, line: 69
Fatal error:
run input file RecpAntiP-cl#1-SG-consP-L0-1-G.tpr was mad
hi,
did u specify an index file in your command line for the 2 groups (protein
and SOl?
> Dhananjay,
>
> Consider searching the list archive... All possible solutions are in
> there.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tsjerk
>
> On 7/27/07, Dhananjay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am getting e
hello all,
is it possible to constrain a distance (or several) between a
ligand-receptor complex inorder to simulate free energy change of
separating the ligand from the receptor?
I intend to use TI and lamda to do free energy calculations.
any help is appreicated.
Belquis
__
Hello,
What I want to do is calculate the free energy difference of pulling the
ligand away from the receptor. I want to do it using theromdynamic
intergration using the Lamda 0/1 stuff. I am just not clear of the
procedure of how to do it.
I want to constraint several distances between the ligan
Hello Gromacs users,
I am trying to do a free energy calculation, which I have never done
before. I have read the manual and the tutorial on the wiki but there is
still some issues not clear to me.
I am trying to calculate free energy difference of pulling the ligand from
a beta-sheet receptor. I
hello all,
I am trying to get the best representative structure of a 40ns MD of a
receptor to use for free energy calculations.
I want to have an idea what is the best way to do that.
I am using g_cluster with the gromos method. Is there a way to estimate
the noise errors of the cluster analysi
Hi TSjerk,
Thanks for the explaination. It is appreciated.
Belquis
> Hi Belquis,
>
> Just some background on the issue. The reason that your solution
> worked, and therefore the failure of your first procedure, is that in
> the second case the frame at t=10ns was modified using the frame at
>
Hi Tsjerk,
Thank you for replying. I did give it a reference structure where the two
parts are together. I solved the problem finally!
I had a 10ns simulation before that and I used -pbc nojump on the original
trjactory and it worked fine..but when I did it for the extra 10 ns i ran,
it didnt work
Hello all,
I have tried using trjconv -pbc(all options) to get a continuous
trjactoary visulations on VMD. I am modeling an 11 residue receptor
antiparellel to itself and one of the receptor strand jumps outside the
box sometimes.
I have used search to solve the problem but everthing i tried did
Hello All,
I have a xtc file and I used trjconv on it to reduce the number of frames
using:
trjconv -f original.xtc -o reduced-frames.xtc -s xx.tpr -timestep 20 -fit
rot+trans -skip 2 -center no
Now I have two xtc files for a 10ns simulation:
original.xtc
reduced-frames.xtc
I did gmxcheck to
Thank you. I will save some energies and velocities in future simulations.
but in this email, my job was not crashed..I terminated it and it wrote
the last velocities and when i wanted to contiune it using pbdconj, it
said it will finish the simulation from the time I terminated it.
so is this ac
sorry to ask again, I hope this is my last question about this.
since I know now that the restarted run I did started from 0 time. I
killed the job and it wrote velocity for the last frame. So since i knew i
have to contiune this run that I just killed, I used tpbconj and it wrote
a new tpr file a
Hi,
I ran gmxcheck and 0 frames have velocities.
so it means it started from beginning?
Belquis
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi Tsjerk,
>>
>> thank u for the answer. I checked my mdp file (nstvout=0). I just want
>> to
>> make sure that since nstvout=0 in my mdp file, and I used tpbconv
>> m
Hi Tsjerk,
thank u for the answer. I checked my mdp file (nstvout=0). I just want to
make sure that since nstvout=0 in my mdp file, and I used tpbconv means
that it generated the run from the beginning of the crashed run? not the
last frame? i
Belquis
> Hi Belquis,
>
> I think you have the sa
Hello all,
I restarted a crashed run due to power outage using these command lines:
tpbconv -s md0-30ns.tpr -f md0-30ns.trr -e md0-30ns.edr -o md0-30ns-C.tpr
then
mdrun -s md0-30ns-C.tpr -e md0-30ns-C.edr -o md0-30ns-C.trr -x
md0-30ns-C.xtc -c after_md0-30ns-C.gro -g md0-30ns-C.log
The r
Hi,
I know this should be trivial..but i cant understand what this option do:
-dtOnly write frame when t MOD dt = first time (ps)
would some explain what is MOD and how this is relevent to g_cluster or
trjconv.
Thank u
___
gmx-users mailing list
Hello all,
I am new to using Gromacs and MD simulation. I am simulating a 9-residue
drug with a box of water. I generated the box using this:
editconf -f xx.gro -o xx.gro -d 0.5 -bt cubic
everything seems fine and the MD run went smooth. However when I look at
the trajectory, I see that the drug
26 matches
Mail list logo