[gmx-users] excluded volume

2008-02-27 Thread Yin Jian
Hi Guys, I am trying to calculate the excluded volume of some crowders. But the result volume is larger than the entire system box volume. May somebody could tell me what's wrong with my calculation? The module I used is g_sas with an additional option "-tv". Thanks a lot.

RE: [gmx-users] problem of pr.mdp file

2008-01-01 Thread Yin Jian
. Regards, Yin Jian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David van der Spoel Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 8:47 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem of pr.mdp file sudheer wrote: > > hi gmx users >

RE: [gmx-users] Brownian dynamics

2007-12-26 Thread Yin Jian
stand me a little better? Regards Yin Jian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Abraham Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 8:33 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Brownian dynamics Yin Jian wrote: > Hi M

RE: [gmx-users] Brownian dynamics

2007-12-26 Thread Yin Jian
stand me a little better? Regards Yin Jian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Abraham Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 8:33 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Brownian dynamics Yin Jian wrote: > Hi Mark,

RE: [gmx-users] Brownian dynamics

2007-12-26 Thread Yin Jian
year Regards, Yin Jian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Abraham Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 6:21 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Brownian dynamics Yin Jian wrote: > Hi Berk, > I am looki

RE: [gmx-users] Brownian dynamics

2007-12-24 Thread Yin Jian
GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Brownian dynamics Yin Jian wrote: > Hi Berk, > I am looking for a way to be able to run MD faster without > Explicit solvent component. Brownian dynamics (I mean langevin > Dynamics) is way out I think. But I am not sure the package > Implemented

[gmx-users] Brownian dynamics

2007-12-24 Thread Yin Jian
, right? Happy new year and merry Xmas Regards, Yin Jian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Berk Hess Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 10:21 PM To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: RE: [gmx-users] position restraints with npt ensemble It will

RE: [gmx-users] Calculating the energy of one molecule in themulti-molecule system

2007-10-12 Thread Yin Jian
Hi Zhenhai, anyway the bonded(bond lengths, bond angles, and dihedral angles) and nonbond energies can be calculated by hand with the geometry information stored in pdb (xtc/trr) and the force field parameters. Regards, Jian Yin Research Staff E5-04-19 Singapore-MIT Alliance (SMA) National Uni

RE: [gmx-users] g_sas by 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 give different results

2007-10-11 Thread Yin Jian
Spoel Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 1:09 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] g_sas by 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 give different results Yin Jian wrote: > > Hi Mark, > Since I have only a user account, I cannot install the version 3.3.2 > by myself into our system.

RE: [gmx-users] g_sas by 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 give different results

2007-10-11 Thread Yin Jian
] On Behalf Of Mark Abraham Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:59 AM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] g_sas by 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 give different results Yin Jian wrote: > Hi David, > I used g_sas modules in version 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 but got not the Same > results a

RE: [gmx-users] g_sas by 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 give different results

2007-10-11 Thread Yin Jian
. Regards, Jian Yin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Abraham Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:59 AM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] g_sas by 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 give different results Yin Jian wrote: > Hi David,

[gmx-users] g_sas by 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 give different results

2007-10-11 Thread Yin Jian
Hi David, I used g_sas modules in version 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 but got not the Same results as follows tail sas331.xvg sas332.xvg ==> sas331.xvg <== 399982 20.4122 3.54058 23.9528 25.8919 399984 20.3506 3.38663 23.7372 27.7211

RE: [gmx-users] 3.3.2 volume

2007-10-11 Thread Yin Jian
: Re: [gmx-users] 3.3.2 volume Yin Jian wrote: > Thanks, Christian. > Sorry for my typo of missing the word "g_sas" before the > Module. > Anyway, I got surface area about 25, but volume about 3.5. > Is that rational? Yup... see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_snowflak

RE: [gmx-users] 3.3.2 volume

2007-10-11 Thread Yin Jian
style. See the xmgrace manual. Yin Jian schrieb: > > Hi David, > I have used the module in 3.3.2 version to calculate the volume > time series. I wonder what is the legend "Volume (nm\S3\N)" in > the output file. > > Regards, > Jian Yin (PhD) > __

[gmx-users] 3.3.2 volume

2007-10-11 Thread Yin Jian
Hi David, I have used the module in 3.3.2 version to calculate the volume time series. I wonder what is the legend "Volume (nm\S3\N)" in the output file. Regards, Jian Yin (PhD) ___ gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://www.gromacs.org

[gmx-users] g_dih

2007-09-04 Thread Yin Jian
Hi Erik, What criteria gromacs uses in g_dih calculation? I mean what is the dihedral transition defined in this module. Thanks in adv. Regards, JY ___ gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http

RE: [gmx-users] Formula for cosine content in essential dynamics

2007-08-27 Thread Yin Jian
Hi All, Can anybody tell me more than that in the gromacs manual, how Gromacs calculate g_sas. What are their criteria basis on hydrophobic and hydrophilic? Thanks in adv. Regards, Jian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Berk Hess Sent: Mo

RE: [gmx-users] FW: rvdw

2007-07-20 Thread Yin Jian
r centers. Cheers, Erik On Jul 20, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Yin Jian wrote: > Thanks a lot, Hess. > By the way, what is the cutoff criteria used in Gromacs, is it > nonzero overlap between LJ-spheres or the mass-centers reside > in the LJ-sphere? Since these two are significantly different

RE: [gmx-users] FW: rvdw

2007-07-20 Thread Yin Jian
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Berk Hess Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 4:56 PM To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: RE: [gmx-users] FW: rvdw >From: "Yin Jian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS u

RE: [gmx-users] FW: rvdw

2007-07-20 Thread Yin Jian
Hess Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 4:30 PM To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: RE: [gmx-users] FW: rvdw >From: "Yin Jian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users >To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" >Subject: RE: [gmx-users] FW:

RE: [gmx-users] FW: rvdw

2007-07-20 Thread Yin Jian
x-users] FW: rvdw >Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:11:35 +0200 > > > > >>From: "Yin Jian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "Berk Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: rvdw >>Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:53:00 +0800 >> >>Hi Dr Berk H