ry another kernel scheduler (see the kernel option
elevator), but this will be a compromise between responsiveness and
throughput.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA,
aining on x, not cnostraining on y,
and just constraining in z.
Yours,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352
y any hazard
constraints= all-bonds
if so, could you check if the run has the error with h-bonds?
In my case that solved the issued with the error message. I suspect a
rounding problem but i have not figured out it yet (not really searched
for, btw).
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Sté
Berk Hess a écrit :
Is the fix committed already, i cannot get it from the current cvs
repository?
Cheers,
Stéphane
Yes, it is: revision 1.57.2.7 of pbc.c.
It just adds "2*" in front of BOX_MARGIN.
Berk.
ok, found, forgot to add the 3.3 branch tag...
Thanks for the fix.
-
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France Fax : (33) 134 652 901
e beginning.
Both info at http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca/index.php?page=Programs
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 65
side will enter
the top of the box, on the extracellular side), this is another good
reason to not disturb the simulations.
You will probably get more input on this, but at least you have some
arguments ...
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.o
02
or
- constraints = all-bonds, dt = 0.004
but not a combination of both.
Constraining all-bonds is *merely only* for getting a bigger time step
for md, but for regular simulations, i would definitely only constrain
h-bonds and use dt=0.002.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, P
heers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France Fax : (
nt on this from the core developpers of GROMACS.
I'm not trying to get any grief here, if you consider this a non-issue,
please ignore the message, that'll be enough to me.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique In
bonds" instead of none should solve you problem.
Consider also coupling counter-ions and solvent as mentionned by Justin
A. Lemkul.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.f
bonds" instead of none should solve you problem.
Consider also coupling counter-ions and solvent as mentionned by Justin
A. Lemkul.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.f
about the implicit
solvent simulation to protein.
Thank you.
There is no Generalised-Born approach implemented (at least available)
but you may consider reaction field. See chapter 7, paragraph
"Electrostatics and VdW".
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD.
as.
As a sidenote, you'll also find it precompiled on Mandriva, in the
contrib section.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél :
wn (think about
maintenance ...).
Hope this helps,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France
atever the failure reason) 1 or 255 ...
This is a rough verification but in a first rapid approach, you can be
sure to not launch the next step if exit status !=0 :-)
Hope this helps,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique In
you can easily generate a *big* box of
water but you'll not really benchmark the system even with such a big
system if your interconnection is not fast enough (i.e. you have fast
network *and* low latency, gigabit for instance is not very efficient
for a good scaling).
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
types properly).
Happy hacking :-)
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France
David van der Spoel a écrit :
Stéphane Téletchéa wrote:
I've found out where the problem lie (at least one of ...).
Small reminder: i've tried to setup a system consisting of HIV
protease + one ligand on a water box. I used the excellent protocol
from John E. Kerrigan (Drug-enzym
ook at on the system (equilibration, rmsd,
temperature, better minimisation if possible, and since it'll be on the
wiki, it will be easier to comment), but i think this was important to
share already.
Thanks a lot in advance for comments,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD.
t an increasing number of signatures while
answering.
As ai said, small detail.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 13
Mark Abraham a écrit :
Stéphane Téletchéa wrote:
While switching from NVT to NPT, i'm crashing my simulation.
The error message seen is (repeated 10 times, then mdrun aborts):
#
Step 1 Warning: pressure scaling more than 1%, mu: -1.59647e+20
-1.59647e+20 -1.59647e+20
Correcting in
la?
Cheers,
Stéphane
(same message as already sent but with a compressed pdb).
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en
up, a GoodPractice section will be a must :-)
Thanks for the advice, i'm still searching why it crashes (i'll go
earlier in the system setup and see if i can change something).
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique
7;m reading the list and trying fo figure out first,
before posting :-)
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
7835
Mark Abraham a écrit :
Stéphane Téletchéa wrote:
WU Yanbin a écrit :
Hi, Everyone,
If I use GROMOS force field, what molecule generator, specially the
topology generation, should I use (just like for gromacs force field,
there is PRODRG)?
I have tried to convert gromacs topology to
Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
The manual is downloadable for free:
http://www.gromacs.org/gromacs/documentation/documentation.html
You can even have a look at it online:
http://www.gromacs.org/external/online-reference-manual.html
Have a good lecture,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téle
try also to use the double version of the program (genbox_d
instead of genbox), allocate swap on the machine (man mkswap), or use a
computer having more memory to create your input file.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique
o understand why the switch to NPT fails.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France
ience,
Stéphane
Joining the two mdp parameters in case the chaining setup needs
additionnal parameter:
pr1 is for the NVT simulation,
pr2 is for the NPT simulation,
i'm not using the same pr for the different pr steps, but this should
not be a problem for the "generic" way of cha
, but
it may be too specific (using LAM/MPI on a sge batch system).
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352
reported by Robert Duke on the
AMBER mailing list a while ago.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en
proDRG beta 2.5 mentionning gromacs 96.1 but for now i
have no idea about the forcefield used, its validation state, and my
question to Dr. van Aalten about this beta server version has not been
answered yet (if someone on the list has an explanation, i'm opened to
explanations).
Cheers,
d for reaction-field (not generalized) is 61 for
SPC water (referring to Heinz, van Gunsteren & Hunenberger, J Chem Phys
2001, 115, p1125-1136).
Is this value a special case for 'generalized-reaction-field' ?
Thanks in advance for clarifications.
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD.
Mark Abraham a écrit :
Stéphane Téletchéa wrote:
I'm probalby doing something wrong but since neither the manual nor
the mailing list has driven me to the correct answer, i'm asking you
the problem. Thanks in advance for you answers and time.
...
Using grompp here and supplying
Source code file: enxio.c, line: 364
Fatal error:
Could not find energy term named 'Pcoupl-Mu-XX'
---
Please note the same setup with full NPT (Pcoul Berendsen every time)
works ...
Thanks again for your comments and explanatio
list for g_desort, see for instance:
http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2007-January/025584.html
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert
inside the
scripts (as recommended on the web page) in case you'll have some doubts
about parameters.
Hoping this will help you analyse faster your DNA trajectories,
Stéphane Téletchéa
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique In
is not very important but from experience there is
attention to port to it :-) (if there is a big discrepancy, you'll need
to find why)
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.f
This said, shuffling and sorting my runs gives me 100%
efficiency to 4cpus =
they run 4x as fast as they do on a single node. I can't come anywhere
near that with
plain runs.
Thanks a lot for your time and answers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.ste
directly, with a different rule if it is
gromacs 3.2.1 or 3.3+.
The attached program itself creates data files in a destination dir
where a batch file can be used for seing the datas with xmgrace. (Of
course i have also a script for producing it ;-).
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, P
-np 4
Thanks a lot for your comments/advices.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-
side of the box and
terminates on the other side.
I've explained in detail how to proceed to correct this, please have a
look at my message from "30.11.2006 17:57".
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique e
h.
I wish I had a dollar for every time I've given the above advice for a
LINCS error!
Mark
Set up a donation page :-)
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Dom
tion flags (and
should be optimal for a Linux-based cluster environment)
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 89
sume delta_lambda is small but different from 0.
Am I missing anything? When you talk about "sequential" run, do you
mean no equilibration for each lambda? (there I do see a problem).
No, using equilibration between each lambda, but i was mixing both cases.
Ignacio
Thanks for your ans
ke your advices into account.
Best wishes,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France
manual, the
Dill's group tutorial, the chapter from Leach, and some other
publication from Aqvist, but still i'm not completely convinced of the
procedure).
Yours,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome
David van der Spoel a écrit :
Stéphane Téletchéa wrote:
editconf -f dppc64.pdb -o dppc64_pbc.pdb -pbc
But unfortunately, some lipids are not imaged (at least 18, 25 and
53). I tried using trjconv but it needs a topol.tpr that i don't have :-(
Any hint ?
Stéphane
It requires some m
David van der Spoel a écrit :
Stéphane Téletchéa wrote:
Hello,
I'm willing to simulate a membrane protein, and to gain lipid
equilibration time, i'm using either Dr Tieleman's lipids or Dr
Vattulainen's lipids (dppc 128 / dppc64).
In order to fully surround my protei
ds ?
I'm willing to do a full automated process for the lipids, this is why i
did use genconf. I'm actually trying to build manually the lipid
bilayer, but since i'm not sure whether i'll use dppc, dmpc, popc, i'm
still searching for an automated method.
Thanks a lo
it:
http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca/index.php?page=Translate_lipdis
I have also a script that does automatize it completely, but it it not
for all purpose actually, so i'll share it later.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathéma
hould get what you want.
HTH
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cede
el and van
Maaren, JCTC, 2006, 2, 1-11).
Try using regular vdw radius of 1.4 nm.
I would use:
coulombtype = PME
rlist = 0.9
rcoulomb= 0.9
rvdw= 1.4
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathém
macs and/or vmd (plot the
bond versus distance while using vmd, both use xmgrace in the end).
BTW, you could use my modified graphlabel.tcl routine to display atom
names under vmd + xmgrace:
http://www.steletch.org/spip.php?article11
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD.
/
(found via the 'search' option).
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas ced
under /mnt/iso (trajconv
may help ?). By chance it is possible that only some frames only are
missing or corrupted, and you should be able te recover most of the rest
(and reconcatenate them).
Best regards,
Nuno
I hope it'll help you,
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletch
the goal.
Thanks.
Chris.
Cheers,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, F
think they'll become next
Christmas 'must have', so price may drop at least by a factor of 2
within one year), but again, it depends on the budget and urgency.
Yours,
Stéphane T.
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informa
n the list.
Regards,
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http://migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Tél : (33) 134 652 891
78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France Fax : (33) 1
rning off HT (in the bios) and
considering your dual-cpu for what they are dual CPUs.
You'd get better calculations figures and better scalability.
Use therefore -np 2.
My 0.02 cents.
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD. http://www.steletch.org
Unité Mathématiq
61 matches
Mail list logo