and Regards,
Rini Gupta
UBC, Vancouver
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list
wrong here.
2) Is this a right way of calculating viscosity using NEMD or I should
do it by using 2CosZ*Vel-X option. Please tell me how can I get
viscosity from this term.
Any suggestions/comments are most welcome.
Thanks and Regards,
Dr. Rini Gupta
UBC, Vancouver
--
gmx-users mailing list
am doing wrong here.
2) Is this a right way of calculating viscosity using NEMD or I should
do it by using 2CosZ*Vel-X option. Please tell me how can I get
viscosity from this term.
Any suggestions/comments are most welcome.
Thanks and Regards,
Dr. Rini Gupta
UBC, Vancouver
--
gmx-users mailing
what I am doing wrong here.
2) Is this a right way of calculating viscosity using NEMD or I should
do it by using 2CosZ*Vel-X option. Please tell me how can I get
viscosity from this term.
Thanks and Regards,
Dr. Rini Gupta
UBC, Vancouver
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http
viscosity for pure water is
not correct ?
Please tell me what I am doing wrong here.
2) Is this a right way of calculating viscosity using NEMD or I should
do it by using 2CosZ*Vel-X option. Please tell me how can I get viscosity from
this term.
Thanks and Regards,
Dr. Rini Gupta
UBC
,
Rini
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:13:39 +0530 wrote
>On 14/06/2011 4:18 AM, Rini Gupta wrote:
> Dear gmx-users,
>
> I am using GROMACS 4.5.4 to run a pure water system using SPC/E model
> containing 32000 molecules. I have done the equilibration for 2 ns
> followed by production run
question is Potential Energy of the system I am getting is -46.7 kJ/mol
while literature value is -41.5 kJ/mol.
Can anyone please tell me why this discrepancy is coming?
Thanks and Regards,
-
Dr Rini Gupta
Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Chemistry
UBC, Vancouver--
gmx-users mailing
: 8.94928 (g/l)
Number of SOL molecules: 0
Processing topology
--
Best Regards,
Rini
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 08:07:27 +0530 wrote
>
On 12/02/2011 12:51 PM, Rini Gupta wrote:
Hello Mark,
Thanks for the re
BE molecule instead of 19.
What can I do now? Is there possibilty that my .gro file is not correct.
Best Regards,
Rini
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 06:58:49 +0530 wrote
>
On 12/02/2011 7:51 AM, Rini Gupta wrote:
Dear gmx users,
I am using gromacs (version 4.
1-4 exclusions
Thanks and Regards,
Rini
----
Dr. Rini Gupta
Postdoctoral Fellow
University of British Columbia
Vancouver
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the a
20
SOL 480
Please help me in this regard.
Thanks and Regards,
Rini
----
Dr. Rini Gupta
Postdoctoral Fellow
University of British Columbia
Vancouver
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search
in this regard.
Thanks and Regards,
Rini
-----
Dr. Rini Gupta
Post doctoral Fellow
Department of Chemistry
University of British Columbia
Vancouver
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please se
in this regard.
Thanks and Regards,
Rini
-----
Dr. Rini Gupta
Post doctoral Fellow
Department of Chemistry
University of British Columbia
Vancouver
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please se
13 matches
Mail list logo