Re: [gmx-users] OpenMM

2010-04-14 Thread PACIELLO GIULIA
correct solution? Which are the approximations done? Thanks a lot, Giulia On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:53:07 +1000 Mark Abraham wrote: On 14/04/2010 7:10 PM, PACIELLO GIULIA wrote: Well, I have used the option -rerun to 'rerun' on CPU the simulation from the parallel code. As you can

Re: [gmx-users] OpenMM

2010-04-14 Thread PACIELLO GIULIA
the .gro files obtained running the parallel and serial codes)...systems are converging to the same equilibrium ensamble? I'm thankful for your help, Giulia On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:03:43 +1000 Mark Abraham wrote: On 14/04/2010 5:18 PM, PACIELLO GIULIA wrote: I dont'know if this is t

Re: [gmx-users] OpenMM

2010-04-14 Thread PACIELLO GIULIA
5e+03 on atom 364 Norm of force = 4.6171844e+02 FROM SERIAL OUTPUT Potential Energy = -1.7814945e+04 Maximum force = 2.1551072e+03 on atom 496 Norm of force = 2.9537823e+02 Thanks, Giulia On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:58:37 +1000 Mark Abraham wrote: On 14/04/2010 4:52 PM, PAC

Re: [gmx-users] OpenMM

2010-04-13 Thread PACIELLO GIULIA
Ok...so how could I know the energies among atoms? And how can I test if my parallel code is running in the correct manner? Thanks, Giulia On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:43:13 +1000 Mark Abraham wrote: On 14/04/2010 4:31 PM, PACIELLO GIULIA wrote: Hi, thanks a lot for your answer, but I have some

Re: [gmx-users] OpenMM

2010-04-13 Thread PACIELLO GIULIA
23 PM, PACIELLO GIULIA wrote: Even if I have followed all the instructions reported for the correct installation of GPU, CUDA, OpenMM and even if my .mdp file for the simulation is written following the features supported in the release Gromacs-OpenMM, the output of the serial code running on C

[gmx-users] OpenMM

2010-04-13 Thread PACIELLO GIULIA
Hi all, I'm using the Application Programming Interface openMM for executing molecular dynamics simulations with Gromacs on an NVIDIA GTX 295 GPU (here is installed CUDA SDK for issuing and managing computations on GPU). Even if I have followed all the instructions reported for the correct i