y info about it.
Thanks,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www
ks in advance,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface
re
the stoichiometric coefficients)
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requ
Hello,
Does anyone know how stable sulfinamides are in vivo? Specifically,
molecules such as Ellman's t-butyl sulfinamide. How does their stability
compare to sulfoxides? Do they get oxidized in vivo? Are they at least
stable in water?
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing list
Hello All,
I would greatly appreciate it if anyone has information on the stability of
methanesulfinamide (SMILES: C[S](=O)N([H])[H]), as well as it's stability
in water.
Thank you.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please sear
Hi All,
I would greatly appreciate it if anyone could provide a reference or
information on the electromagnetic absorbance characteristics of dimethyl
sulfoxide, especially in the region of 800-1400nm.
Thank you,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org
11:20 PM, David van der Spoel
wrote:
> On 2012-03-21 03:06, Nancy wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would greatly appreciate it if anyone could provide a reference or
>> information on the electromagnetic absorbance characteristics of
>> dimethyl sulfoxide, especially
Hi All,
I would greatly appreciate it if anyone could provide a reference or
information on the electromagnetic absorbance characteristics of dimethyl
sulfoxide, especially in the region of 800-1400nm.
Thank you,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org
Hi All,
I would like to determine the ability of several small molecules and
peptides to "bind" to an ice surface, using Gromacs. What would be the
best procedure for doing so? Also, would topolbuild be a good choice for
generating the topologies?
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
--
gmx-use
Thank you very much for the information.
Nancy
On 11/29/11, Dallas Warren wrote:
> http://www.google.com.au/search?q=ice+crystal+coordinate+file&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
>
> Second listed item contains (or leads you to
Hi All,
I would like to perform molecular dynamics with an ice crystal surface;
does anyone know if such a structure file can be obtained online?
Thanks,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
Hi All,
I need to determine the RMSD of a small molecule cocrystallized ligand,
against a large number of predicted docked conformations. Please let me
know what is the best method for doing this.
Thank you very much,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http
Hi All,
I heard that LAMMPS is supposedly good for simulating lipid bilayers in
water. I haven't used LAMMPS before; does anyone know if it would be worth
to try it in addition to Gromacs?
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromac
Thanks alot for the info.
Nancy
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Nancy wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to calculate RMSDs of a large number of small molecule
>> conformations against a reference conformation, is there a
Hi All,
I would like to calculate RMSDs of a large number of small molecule
conformations against a reference conformation, is there a simple software
program or method that can be used to perform such calculations?
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
Thanks, I appreciate the clarification. Also, can Gromacs be accelerated
with a laptop nVidia GPU (320M)?
Nancy
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Nancy wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've used used Gromacs under Linux, and I
Hi All,
I've used used Gromacs under Linux, and I'm wondering whether it can be used
under Windows 7 and/or Snow Leopard (10.6.6).
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archiv
Hi All,
For pioglitazone, are the two tautomers depicted in the attached figure the
major forms at pH 7.0?
Also, are there any published articles, or other evidence that would confirm
that this is indeed the correct tautomeric distribution at pH 7?
Thank you,
Nancy
<>--
gmx-users mailin
ligand-protein interactions.
Does anyone know if the diketone or enol, or perhaps a different tautomer,
would be predominant at pH 7.4?
Thanks in advance.
Nancy
<>--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search
ot;Figure_2.gif". The
different tautomeric forms predicted by MarvinSketch are shown in
"Figure_3.gif".
Can anyone explain where these predictions come from, and if they are
correct?
Thanks,
Nancy
<><><>--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lis
of them.
Which tautomer would be dominant at the physiological pH of ~7.0?
Also, are there any software programs that can predict which tautomer would
be correct?
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
<>--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx
Hi All,
In the figure illustrating the various tautomers, some are actually
aromatic; wouldn't these be the predominant species at pH 7.4? Also, how
could one start docking without a properly defined ligand?
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
&
, 21 30–33, as a reference, but it does make it clear as to
which tautomer is most appropriate for simulating binding to a receptor
protein at pH 7.4.
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
<>--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please se
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the useful info.
Nancy
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Nancy wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am trying to add partial charges to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
>> (NAD+), for input to molecular simu
Gasteiger charges) is written below
(and attached as NAD.mol2 with corresponding PNG structure image).
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
@MOLECULE
NAD.mol2
70741 0 0
SMALL
USER_CHARGES
@ATOM
1 C1
convert
individual files using this method. Is there another way to convert a large
number of SDF files to Mol2 format at once, and also preserve the filenames?
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please
the X-Ray crystal
structure, as one would expect identical binding to both sides?
Thank you very much.
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don
input, determine protein-ligand interactions, list them, and visualize
docked conformations?
If anyone has information, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the
is problem.
Thanks,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to
and I am
just using Mesa drivers (and it gives the same libGL warning).
I am not sure where the "Segmentation Fault" comes from (or what it means in
this case).
Please advise,
Thanks,
Nancy
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listin
Hello,
I ran a docking simulation, and I have results in .mol format, and a protein
(.pdb format). I would like to save both as a single PDB file, as input for
Gromacs. Please advise as to what is the best way to do this.
Thanks,
Nancy
___
gmx-users
I'm glad to be of help; yes, I would like to beta test topolbuild 1.3.
Thank you.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Bruce D. Ray wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 8:47:33 PM, Nancy
> wrote:
>
> > In an earlier message, it was stated that topolbuild generated topo
s the OPLS-AA force
field used?
Thank you.
Nancy
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Bruce D. Ray wrote:
> On Sunday, August 9, 2009 at 4:32:19 PM, Nancy
> wrote:
>
> > I obtained the ethylene glycol (1,2-ethanediol) structure from the URL:
> > http://www.rcsb.org
Thank you for the article.
Nancy
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Dallas B. Warren <
dallas.war...@pharm.monash.edu.au> wrote:
> You might want to consider the parameters I developed for propylene
> glycol http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/mp8001667 ... might provide some
> guid
2 (34), pp
10732–10740
Are you suggesting that the authors used incorrect parameters?
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Nancy wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have successfully minimised and equilibrated two systems, one consisting
>>
are there programs that will automatically generate charge values and
other parameters for an arbitrary molecule?
Thank you.
Nancy
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the
picosecond. It remained in the trans conformation for the rest of the
equilibration.
Thanks,
Nancy
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Nagy, Peter I. wrote:
>
> Dear Nancy,
>
> It was useful to find charges for the solute... I am not a GROMACS user,
> so I do not know what checks
Therefore,
the hydrogen bonds do form, given the charges adopted from the methanol
topology (O: -0.574, H: +0.398, CH2: +0.176). Do these charge values seem
reasonable?
The ethylene glycol lacks explicit non-polar hydrogens; is that normal for
this type of system, force field
) forms to the solvent molecules. Is this normal for such a
system?
Thank you.
Nancy
==em.mdp==
constraints = none
integrator = steep
nsteps = 1
emtol = 10.0
emstep = 0.01
nstlist = 2
c
molecules;
what type of thermostat is reasonable for such a system?
Nancy
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Nancy wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have successfully minimised and equilibrated ethylene glycol in a water
>> box. I have notic
settled.
Check for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep.
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
There were 12 inconsistent shifts. Check your topology
Segmentation fault
===
I don't know what is happening wrong. Plea
w what the problem might be?
Thanks,
Nancy
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Bruce D. Ray wrote:
> On Thursday, August 6, 2009 at 4:08:18 PM, Nancy
> wrote:
>
> > I have attempted to perform energy minimisation from scratch again, and
> these are the
> > com
ering why the Lysozyme tutorial at:
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/index.html
does not have the same problems?
Is there a way to stop minimisation and continue later from that same point?
Thanks,
Nancy
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Justin A.
===
I believe that equilibration is failing because of the large forces on the
molecules during minimisation (although I am not sure, as I was able to run
a simulation without proper minimisation before).
If at all possible, please advise on how to reduce the energies and forces
during minimisati
mx, I noticed that most of the motion of
the water molecules occurs within the first 50 picoseconds.
Please advise on how to further minimise this system.
Thank you.
Nancy
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Bruce D. Ray wrote:
> On Thursday, August 6, 2009 at 11:58:20 AM, Nancy
> wrote
e what values of the energies are
reasonable for this system, and how to minimise it further. Please advise.
Thank you.
Nancy
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Bruce D. Ray wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 5, 2009 at 6:03:51 PM, Nancy
> wrote:
> > I am trying to run equilibratio
= yes
gen_temp= 300
gen_seed= -1
==
the system "blows up". Addtionally, the structure of the solute is
incorrect (all atoms are bonded to each other).
Please advise on how to minimise such a system further, and as to why the
equilibration is so unsta
rce = 2.1965221e+04 on atom 39
Norm of force = 2.1487129e+03
==
Please advise on how to further decrease the forces.
Thanks,
Nancy
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Nancy wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>
what value of emtol is reasonable for this
type of small system.
Please advise
Thanks
Nancy
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/s
ure of the ethanediol solute seems to be incorrect
throughout the equilbration.
I am unsure what is going wrong, please help.
Thank you.
Nancy
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Bruce D. Ray wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 4, 2009, at 6:30:57 PM, Nancy
> wrote:
> > I am trying to simul
20.6156 0.5033 0.1435
===
I am not sure where the errors are occuring (I am also wondering if the
absence of explicit non-polar hydrogens in the .gro files are relevant).
Please adivse.
Thanks.
Nancy
___
gmx-users maili
I used gzip to uncompress the file first:
# gzip -d topolbuild1_2_1.tgz
and then I used tar:
# tar -xvf topolbuild1_2_1.tar
This seems to work.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Nancy wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I downloaded &quo
se.
Thank you.
Nancy
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the lis
se.
Thank you.
Nancy
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Bruce D. Ray wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:19:19 PM, Nancy wrote:
> > If it necessary to manually create force field parameters for each
> molecule, then how can one run a
> > simulation involving a number of arbitr
High-throughput "in silico" screening (e.g. for ligand-protein binding) has
been performed on a number of systems. How are such automated simulations
performed (I assume they utilize molecular dynamics)?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Nanc
capable of running
simulations on arbitrary molecules without having to "piece together" a
force field for each molecule?
Thanks,
Nancy
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Nancy wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to r
---
Please help.
Thank you,
Nancy
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don
Thanks, it works.
Nancy
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Joshua Adelman wrote:
> Hi Nancy,
> Is it loading it in, but not displaying it? If that's the case, you need to
> load a pdb file in first or else VMD can't guess how to display the molecule
> from position da
Hello,
I have generated several trajectory files (*.trr, *.xtc) from running MD
simulations, and I can view them with the "ngmx" program included with
GROMACS, but I am unable to view them in Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD).
Please advise.
Than
tep, but I do not know
specifically what parameters to run the energy minimisation. Please advise.
Thank you.
Nancy
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Nancy wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to run energy minimisation on a
Thank you.
Nancy
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the lis
ound in residue 17 while adding improper
---
Please let me know how I should go about this.
Thanks,
Nancy
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> Quoting Nancy :
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am new to Gromacs, but have prior experience with MD simu
Thank you.
Nancy
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Us
ot;.
Very grateful for your advice and help!!!
Nancy
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Abraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] box size changed
Nancy Deng w
ion stage, the water particles seems
prefer to roam away from the originally centered small molecule, which i
guess the reason to increase the overall size of the box...
Not sure whether this provides some useful input to help me out of the
trouble :)
thanks
Nancy
- Original Mess
fix this??? Whether
Gromacs is the right tool to sample small molecule conformational space.
I desperatedly need your advice and appreciate your any input!!!
Thanks,
nancy
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailma
66 matches
Mail list logo