Re: [gmx-users] confusion about segmentation fault during mdrun

ed, May 19, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > Lan Hua wrote: > >> Hi Justin, >> >> I appreciated your quick answers. So if I understand correctly, using >> constraints = hbonds with the time step of 2fs, it should be fine, right? >> >&g

Re: [gmx-users] confusion about segmentation fault during mdrun

Thanks. The simulations are regular MD in explicit water at room temperature. Lan On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > Lan Hua wrote: > >> Hi Justin, >> >> I appreciated your quick answers. So if I understand correctly, using >>

Re: [gmx-users] confusion about segmentation fault during mdrun

Hi Justin, I appreciated your quick answers. So if I understand correctly, using constraints = hbonds with the time step of 2fs, it should be fine, right? Thanks, Lan On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > Lan Hua wrote: > >> Hi Justin, >>

Re: [gmx-users] confusion about segmentation fault during mdrun

Hi Justin, Thank you so much for your quick reply and good suggestions. The following is my answer. On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > Lan Hua wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I understand that the error of segmentation fault may co

[gmx-users] confusion about segmentation fault during mdrun

Hi All, I understand that the error of segmentation fault may come from many reasons, but I just couldn't figure out the reason of this error in my simulations. I want to run md simulations with explicit water for 20 structures of one domain (residue 77-148) of calmodulin (PDB 1CFC). These