Hi,
Please see the following links:
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/umbrella/
http://wires.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WiresArticle/wisId-WCMS66.html
I think you will understand the concept of the pulling force once you go
through either of the links.
It's basical
Thanks Justin and Professor Shirts. The gmxdump on the resulting tpr did
indeed solve a lot of my problems. Thanks again.
--
View this message in context:
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Free-Energy-Calculations-in-Gromacs-tp5007495p5009115.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list
Is there a reason you would like to keep it at 105K? Just curious which
forcefield are you using?
Also, for proper surface tension, there is an option called
pcoupltype = surface-tension.
I think you should check that out.
--
View this message in context:
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.co
Exactly so. I think Gromacs issues a warning when you try to initialize
velocities with Parrinello-Rahman barostat. But if you performed your
equilibration at 105K using Berendsen barostat, I think it should be okay
and you should put gen-vel = no.
--
View this message in context:
http://groma
Hi,
As Justin had already suggested, restraints will lead to nasty atomic
clashes. Looking at the gro file you have provided, it seems that the system
is very poorly equilibrated.
I had a similar issue. If the forcefield you are using is accurate enough,
follow the steps as follows:
1. Take th
Hi,
I have been trying to perform the simulations using the amber forcefield, in
which the [ pairtypes ] directive is not defined explicitly in the
ffnonbonded.itp file, but rather the 1-4 interactions are generated as per
the defaults section in the forcefield.itp file. I was wondering what
happe
6 matches
Mail list logo