[gmx-users] Re: mdrun segmentation fault for new build of gromacs 4.6.1

mdrun. Cheers, -- Szilárd On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Amil Anderson <[hidden email]> wrote: > Roland, > > Here is the output from the debug run with the stack trace: > > [aanderson@warp2-login gmxdemo]$ gdb mdrun > GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-27.el5) > Copyright (C) 200

[gmx-users] Re: mdrun segmentation fault for new build of gromacs 4.6.1

so that the build system does not detect it. Check the mdrun -version output, specifically the reported "FFT library", after you recompile mdrun. Cheers, -- Szilárd On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Amil Anderson <[hidden email]> wrote: > Roland, > > Here is the output

[gmx-users] Re: mdrun segmentation fault for new build of gromacs 4.6.1

t seems it detected SSE4.1 correctly. Could you post the stack trace for the crash? (see previous mail for instructions) Roland On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Amil Anderson <[hidden email]> wrote: > Roland, > > I have posted the cmake output (cmake-4.6.1) and the file CMakeError.l

[gmx-users] Re: mdrun segmentation fault for new build of gromacs 4.6.1

Roland, I have posted the cmake output (cmake-4.6.1) and the file CMakeError.log at the usual https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h6867f7ivl5pcl9/j9gt9CsVdP I see there are some errors but don't know what to make of them. Thanks, Amil -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.co

[gmx-users] Re: mdrun segmentation fault for new build of gromacs 4.6.1

Roland, I have now run the regression test on my installation and it all fails for runmd (segmentation fault). Don't see that anything else is being tested. I've placed the output of the make check (Make_check.out) at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h6867f7ivl5pcl9/j9gt9CsVdP I'll copy the first

[gmx-users] Re: gmx-users Digest, Vol 71, Issue 102

Kari, Since you did not give a mini-presentation this past week, you should be prepared to give one when I call on you. When I call on you will depend the timing of the other presentations. This week is the first possibility. The summary you put in my box seems to be pretty far off top