Thank you Sir for clarifying the confusion.
Regards
kavya
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Erik Marklund wrote:
> I wouldn't say wrong, but I realized that some residue may make two hbonds
> to different parts of the protein, i.e. to the main chain and to a side
> chain at the same time. With -
On 3/22/13 3:14 PM, 라지브간디 wrote:
Dear Justin,
Actually I've manually added the heme -ligand parameters details such as bond,
angle and dihedral to my topology created by pdb2gmx via gromos43a1. ( Those
manually added parameters details are taken from charmm and amber ff, which are
availabl
Dear Justin,
Actually I've manually added the heme -ligand parameters details such as bond,
angle and dihedral to my topology created by pdb2gmx via gromos43a1. ( Those
manually added parameters details are taken from charmm and amber ff, which are
available in some published articles ).
I co
Hi,
Actually, if you don't want to run across the network, with those Westmere
processors you should be fine with running OpenMP across the two sockets,
i.e
mdrun -ntomp 24
or to run without HyperThreading (which can be sometimes faster) just use
mdrun -ntomp 12 -pin on
Now, when it comes to GPU
I wouldn't say wrong, but I realized that some residue may make two
hbonds to different parts of the protein, i.e. to the main chain and
to a side chain at the same time. With -merge this counts as one if
you analyze the entire protein. If you split your analysis such hbonds
will show up in
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Albert wrote:
> On 03/22/2013 03:45 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
>
>> As you can see in your plot, no replicas from 400K got down to 300K in the
>> 1.5ns you simulated. So you've so far derived no benefit from REMD (unless
>> you want sampling at lots of temperatures).
Sir,
I tried -nomerge. It is fine now. But will it be wrong to
calculate without nomerge option?
Thank you
Kavya
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Erik Marklund wrote:
> I could see how -merge (on by default) could lead to this. Have you tried
> -nomerge?
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Mar 22, 2013, at 4:46
On 3/22/13 9:18 AM, 라지브간디 wrote:
Dear Justin,
I got understand the gromos ff improper style. however, what i am asking here
is how would i use the charmm/amber improper from literuatre where they
indicate the improper in this was ( something X-X)
Improper
CPB-X-X-CR1E 90.0 0.0
CC - X-X
I could see how -merge (on by default) could lead to this. Have you
tried -nomerge?
Erik
On Mar 22, 2013, at 4:46 PM, Kavyashree M wrote:
Dear Users,
As suggested earlier by Erik I used 4.6 to calculate the hydrogen
bonds.
Still the
Total intra-protein hydrogen bonds is not equal (MM +MS
Dear Users,
As suggested earlier by Erik I used 4.6 to calculate the hydrogen bonds.
Still the
Total intra-protein hydrogen bonds is not equal (MM +MS +SS) hydrogen bond.
Is there any other solution?
Thank you
Kavya
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Kavyashree M wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> Sure I wi
On 03/22/2013 03:45 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
As you can see in your plot, no replicas from 400K got down to 300K in the
1.5ns you simulated. So you've so far derived no benefit from REMD (unless
you want sampling at lots of temperatures). Perhaps a simulation a hundred
times longer might get a few
As you can see in your plot, no replicas from 400K got down to 300K in the
1.5ns you simulated. So you've so far derived no benefit from REMD (unless
you want sampling at lots of temperatures). Perhaps a simulation a hundred
times longer might get a few such events? You might as well have run a
sim
This would normally mean you are somehow calling code from one GROMACS
version with code from another. Some kind of dynamic library loading mishap?
Mark
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Nikunj Maheshwari <
nixcrazyfor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all...
>
> We ran REMD simulations for 36 replica
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Anna MARABOTTI wrote:
>
> Dear Mark, Justin and other gmx-users,
> thank you very much for your
> help. Thanks to your suggestions, I made some steps forward, but still I
> don't see the end of my travel...
>
> First of all, I would like to say
> that my previou
Dear Mark, Justin and other gmx-users,
thank you very much for your
help. Thanks to your suggestions, I made some steps forward, but still I
don't see the end of my travel...
First of all, I would like to say
that my previous problem was solved when I renamed O1 to OA. Justin was
right. When I
Dear Justin,
I got understand the gromos ff improper style. however, what i am asking here
is how would i use the charmm/amber improper from literuatre where they
indicate the improper in this was ( something X-X)
Improper
> CPB-X-X-CR1E 90.0 0.0
> CC - X-X-NB 18.3 0.0
>
What X sh
Hello:
I've finished a replica exchange simulation with 72 replica
(300K-580K) under explicit solvent model. It generate 72 trajectory and
the replica since to "cross" well with neighboring temperature. Here is
the figure:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/56271062/REMD.png
I am just wondering how
Hello Szilard
Many thanks for these very useful comments!
We run jobs on a single node of a small Apple cluster (no Infiniband
unfortunately). One node has two Intel(R) Xeon(R) X5650 Processors each
with 6 cores and 12 threads, so in total 12 cores and 24 threads.
I have compiled GROMACS 4.6.1 w
Dear all...
We ran REMD simulations for 36 replicas. We got an error which stopped the
whole simulation.
"
Reading file md21.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (single precision)
Loaded with Money
Reading file md24.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (single precision)
Loaded with Money
---
19 matches
Mail list logo