[gmx-users] Lysozyme tutorial-error with moleculetype

2012-05-19 Thread delara aghaie
Dear Gromacs Users I am doing Justin's Lysozyme tutorial. In EM step I got the error with molecule type. (I am using Gromacs, 4.0.5) It was about Cl and Na. I noticed that because I have selected OPLS forcefield, I should change the name of Cl and Na in my .top file to Na+ and Cl-. I did this and

Re: [gmx-users] constraints between protein ligand - metal chelation

2012-05-19 Thread R.S.K.Vijayan
Many thanks for your response. No special reasons for parametrizing the ligand and the protein as a separate system. I dont think that the ligand and protein can be parametrized as a single system, but will definitely try doing it as a single system and see if it works. Regards Vijayan.R On Sat,

Re: [gmx-users] constraints between protein ligand - metal chelation

2012-05-19 Thread Peter C. Lai
Is there a particular reason why the ligand has been parameterized as a separate moleculetype from the protein in your case? I prefer to treat coordination bonds as "real bonds" instead of relying on electrostatic interactions anyway, since it is the only way to conservatively ensure the coordinati

[gmx-users] constraints between protein ligand - metal chelation

2012-05-19 Thread R.S.K.Vijayan
Dear Gromacs users I was wondering if there exists any technique that sets distance restraint between specified ligand (atoms) and the protein(atoms) in Gromacs. I am simulating a system which contains metal ions coordinated to the Ligand. I looked in to the mailing list and Gromacs manual and fi

[gmx-users] In Silico Compound Library Search

2012-05-19 Thread Nancy
Hi All, Does anyone know of a free cheminformatic service from which it's possible to narrow down a search for molecules by inputting limits on their molecular parameters, such as molecular weight or the number of hydrogen bond donors, etc? Such a resource would be of great help. Thanks in advan

[gmx-users] Re: BAR calculations with tabulated non-bonded potentials

2012-05-19 Thread jrustad
Justin A. Lemkul wrote > > > You don't need the pull code if the two atoms are in the same > [moleculetype] - a > "molecule" in Gromacs is any set of atoms; they don't necessarily have to > make > chemical sense. The only problem I see is that if you have two atoms in > the > same location,

Re: [gmx-users] Re: BAR calculations with tabulated non-bonded potentials

2012-05-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 5/19/12 5:42 PM, jrustad wrote: Justin A. Lemkul wrote I don't know how complex the system is you're dealing with, but at this point, isn't it just far more straightforward to construct a rudimentary force field with a few atom types rather than rely on (slow) tabulated functions and pote

[gmx-users] Re: BAR calculations with tabulated non-bonded potentials

2012-05-19 Thread jrustad
Justin A. Lemkul wrote > > I don't know how complex the system is you're dealing with, but at this > point, > isn't it just far more straightforward to construct a rudimentary force > field > with a few atom types rather than rely on (slow) tabulated functions and > potential funny business to

Re: [gmx-users] Re: BAR calculations with tabulated non-bonded potentials

2012-05-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 5/19/12 1:13 PM, jrustad wrote: Thanks- yes, I suspected this might be the case, however, in the context of a free energy calculation it seems difficult to associate the lookup table with a molecule type rather than an atom type. In other words, I have defined a molecule "Fe" which will cha

Re: [gmx-users] Different Lipids into one Moleculetype (for position restrain)

2012-05-19 Thread Ricardo O. S. Soares
I thank you all so much for aiding me on this matter, Jan, Peter and Justin. Now things are way clerarer! Cheers, Ricardo. > > De: Peter C. Lai >Para: jalem...@vt.edu; Discussion list for GROMACS users > >Enviadas: Sábado, 19 de Maio de 2012 1:01 >Assunto:

[gmx-users] Re: BAR calculations with tabulated non-bonded potentials

2012-05-19 Thread jrustad
Thanks- yes, I suspected this might be the case, however, in the context of a free energy calculation it seems difficult to associate the lookup table with a molecule type rather than an atom type. In other words, I have defined a molecule "Fe" which will change from Fe2 to Fe3. So, its true th

Re: [gmx-users] Justin-lipid tutorials..

2012-05-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 5/19/12 9:06 AM, rama david wrote: Thank you Justin.. I am sorry Because I am going to ask you the stupid questions but very imp to me ... 1. Consider your Tutorial In that Instead of using vanderwall radii adjustment to add water , I wish to use keepbyz.sh script ... In th

Re: [gmx-users] Justin-lipid tutorials..

2012-05-19 Thread rama david
Thank you Justin.. I am sorry Because I am going to ask you the stupid questions but very imp to me ... 1. Consider your Tutorial In that Instead of using vanderwall radii adjustment to add water , I wish to use keepbyz.sh script ... In these case What would be the value of Lower and

Re: [gmx-users] Justin-lipid tutorials..

2012-05-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 5/19/12 8:23 AM, rama david wrote: Thank you Justin .. .. I goes through these link .. http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Membrane_Simulations Please Can any one clearly define me What is Lower Z and Upper Z in the|| keepbyz.sh Can keepbyz.sh use to remove the water in hydrophob

Re: [gmx-users] Justin-lipid tutorials..

2012-05-19 Thread rama david
Thank you Justin .. .. I goes through these link .. http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Membrane_Simulations Please Can any one clearly define me What is Lower Z and Upper Z in the keepbyz.sh Can keepbyz.sh use to remove the water in hydrophobic region without affecting the box dimensio

Re: [gmx-users] Justin-lipid tutorials..

2012-05-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 5/19/12 7:49 AM, rama david wrote: Hi Gromacs friends .. I am doing justin Lipid-tutoria on lipid .. http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/membrane_protein/01_pdb2gmx.html I completed upto the ion addition and energy minimisation.. While doing equilibrati

Re: [gmx-users] extention of the simulation

2012-05-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 5/19/12 6:15 AM, Anirban wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Turgay Cakmak mailto:turgaycakma...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Gromacs users, I have a question related to the extension of the simulation. I have done 10 ns simulation (several peptides in a box). Now, I want to

[gmx-users] Justin-lipid tutorials..

2012-05-19 Thread rama david
Hi Gromacs friends .. I am doing justin Lipid-tutoria on lipid .. http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/membrane_protein/01_pdb2gmx.html I completed upto the ion addition and energy minimisation.. While doing equilibration I stuck with the following problem .. 1

Re: [gmx-users] dipole moment of a molecule

2012-05-19 Thread Dommert Florian
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 09:49 -0700, Milinda Samaraweera wrote: > Hi Guys > > > Could you please explain to me how to use the g_dipole method to > calculate the dipole moment of a Solute in a solvent. > Hi, there has just recently been a discussion on this mailing list. Actually you need just a

Re: [gmx-users] extention of the simulation

2012-05-19 Thread Anirban
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Turgay Cakmak wrote: > > Hi Gromacs users, > > > I have a question related to the extension of the simulation. > > I have done 10 ns simulation (several peptides in a box). Now, I want to > extend it 10ns more. > > > >- As far as I see from “Justin Lemkul’s Lys

[gmx-users] extention of the simulation

2012-05-19 Thread Turgay Cakmak
Hi Gromacs users, I have a question related to the extension of the simulation. I have done 10 ns simulation (several peptides in a box). Now, I want to extend it 10ns more. - As far as I see from “Justin Lemkul’s Lysozyme in water tutorial”, to extend simulation, following should be do