Try to maximize the intra- and inter-peptide hydrophobic interactions?
I guess it can share the same parameters, just guess, no much idea.
lina
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] on behalf
of Vitaly Chaban [vvcha...@gmail.
I think your choice should depend on what bonds you expect between the
two monomers forming a dimer.
--
Dr. Vitaly Chaban
> Dear gmx-users
> I want to simulate a protein which biological function defined by dimer
> formation. I need to simulate this protein in dimer as well as in
> monomeric for
Dear gmx-users
I want to simulate a protein which biological function defined by dimer
formation. I need to simulate this protein in dimer as well as in
monomeric form to solve my objectives. I am using Gromacs-4.0.4 for
simulation. I have a doubt, is there any specific parameters for dimer
simulat
- Original Message -
From: Da-Wei Li
Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 6:23
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] New beta release: 4.5-beta3
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> Hi,all
>
> Unfortunately, it still crash. Here it is the output of mdrun. Both
> Gromacs-4.0.7 and non-parallel 4.5b3
Hi There,
I was trying to run a free energy tutorial given at "*
http://www.dillgroup.ucsf.edu/group/wiki/index.php?title=Free_Energy:_Tutorial
*"
While trying the very first run i.e. mdrun using "*min_lbfgs0.mdp*" I ended
up with following error
ERROR: With coulombtype = P
Hi all,
Can anyone please give me a mdp file for running pulling simulations
in implicit solvent using GROMACS?
Thanks in advance
Samrat
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www
Please keep all Gromacs-related correspondence on the gmx-users list.
Implicit solvent is available in the current 4.5 beta release.
Another tip: the mailing list search would have turned this same answer up in a
few seconds. This same question has been asked dozens of times.
-Justin
Samra
Hi,all
Unfortunately, it still crash. Here it is the output of mdrun. Both
Gromacs-4.0.7 and non-parallel 4.5b3 work fine on this system. I use
mvapich2 and intel compiler.
***
Getting Loaded...
Reading file em.tpr, VERSION 4.5-beta3 (single precision)
Loaded with Money
Hi Ondrej,
I can confirm the problem. We'll fix it for the next release
(unfortunately it didn't make it in -beta3).
Rossen
On 08/10/2010 04:13 PM, Ondrej Marsalek wrote:
Dear all,
I have installed 4.5 beta2 using cmake and it seems that the GMXRC
files are missing in the installation. Can
New beta release of gromacs is available for testing:
ftp://ftp.gromacs.org/pub/gromacs/gromacs-4.5-beta3.tar.gz.
Many bugs have been fixed in this release, mainly double precision
support with icc compilers, SSE2. Have a look at the release note on the
website for more details. There are st
dear Rob,
you can manually edit one of the gro file to increase the length in one
direction by an arbitrary amount, then use genbox:
genbox -cp -cs
(I just did that with water and methanol from the gromacs tutorials,
works just fine)
maybe set -vdwd to an adequate value to prevent insertion o
Hello. I have tested GBSA in 4.5 beta2 on 3 different machines: OSX 10.6 w/
core2duo, Centos5.5 w/ dual socket quad core Xenon, and another Linux machine
(unsure of OS) w/ quad socket hexacore AMD Istambul. I tested the same tpr on
all machines and only the core2duo runs the job successfully. Th
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:58 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use the pme algorithm in GROMACS. Thge size of my box is
> 8.2x8.2x8.2 in reduced units. I am considering a collection of 1000
> of CO2 molecules. If I am using reduced units, the values of the
> parameters "rcoulomb=0.9" I think should b
This surprised me since most of the systems that I am interested in
have improper dihedrals. Is it possible that I did something wrong here?
### Error message from mdrun-gpu:
Program mdrun-gpu, VERSION 4.0.99-dev-20100315
Source code file:
/project/pomes/cneale/GPC/exe/intel/GPUgromacs/gromacs-4
Hi,
I'm trying to convert protein-DNA complex using pdb2gmx with gromos53a6.ff
$ pdb2gmx -f del.pdb -o del.gro -p del.top -i del.itp -n del.ndx -ignh
In gromacs version 4.5-beta2 the result is:
Processing chain 3 'C' (516 atoms, 25 residues)
There are 0 donors and 0 acceptors
There are 0 hydrog
Thanks. I am definitely going to look into that.
Quoting chris.ne...@utoronto.ca:
Nisha:
Simply applying available tools and seeing if the distribution looks
okay is not a good plan. You should have a very well-defined idea of
what you are trying to test and then pick a tool to get that done.
Hi there,
I see in ffoplsaa.rtp that, e.g., CYS has:
HB1opls_1400.060 2
HB2opls_1400.060 2
But according to latest PDB atom nomenclature it should be:
HB2 ...
HB3 ...
Of course that using pdb2gmx -ignh and it should avoid this problem,
but unless for any other spe
Hi,
This bug is now fixed in git release-4-5-patches (commit 0a31a047f429).
Rossen
On 8/6/10 11:33 AM, david.groc...@uk.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi, this is the first time I have messaged this group, so please bear with me.
I have had little trouble with previous versions (4.0.7 for example), howe
Dear all,
I have installed 4.5 beta2 using cmake and it seems that the GMXRC
files are missing in the installation. Can anyone confirm this?
Best,
Ondrej
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www
On 8/10/10 8:40 AM, vivek sharma wrote:
Hi There,
I want to benchmark the scalability and speed for gromacs-4 on our
cluster.
I want to know if there is any benchmarking activity already goin on?
I have browsed and got benchmarking for gromacs-3 and it seems that
gromacs-4 is much more scalab
Hi all,
I am trying to get 4.5-beta2 running on graphic card but mdrun-gpu (gcc
4.1.3) is still complaining about something in forcefields
OPLS - The combination rules of the used force-field do not match the one
supported by OpenMM: sigma_ij = (sigma_i + sigma_j)/2, eps_ij = sqrt(eps_i
* eps_j)
- Original Message -
From: vivek sharma
Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 16:41
Subject: [gmx-users] Gromacs-4 benchmarking
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> Hi There,
> I want to benchmark the scalability and speed for gromacs-4 on our cluster.
> I want to know if there is any ben
Use the same box size for both. Then move one box with eidtconf
-translate by its boxlength. Afterwards, you can simply put the boxes
together to one large one.
Quoting tekle...@ualberta.ca:
Dear Gromacs,
I want to combine two separately equilibrated solvents into one mixed
solvent file.
Hi guys
Thanks for your help! I will consider your suggestions.
Huiwen
From: NG HUI WEN
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 11:05 AM
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: Large output files and limited disk space. How do I handle
them?
Dear gmxusers,
I have a very basic question here wh
- Original Message -
From: tekle...@ualberta.ca
Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 13:50
Subject: [gmx-users] Mix two solvents
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Dear Gromacs,
>
> I want to combine two separately equilibrated solvents into one
> mixed solvent file. How can I do that? I want to c
25 matches
Mail list logo