Ramachandran G wrote:
Yes, i do write velocities to output trajectory at 10 fs. But i
understood from the thread(below link)
that 'trjorder' do not save the velocities
http://oldwww.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2003-May/005681.html
I don't know is there any other way we can do it in the
Hi,
I am trying to coarse-grain a system. For that I want to optimize the bond ,
angle and dihedral parameters of coarse-grained model based on atomistic
simulation. For that, in the atomistic simulation part, I want to calculate the
the distribution of 'effective' angle made by the 'centre of
Yes, i do write velocities to output trajectory at 10 fs. But i
understood from the thread(below link)
that 'trjorder' do not save the velocities
http://oldwww.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2003-May/005681.html
I don't know is there any other way we can do it in the new version.
Thanks.
Ra
Ramachandran G wrote:
Thank you, I have installed new version of gromacs4.0.5 and trjorder
works fine in giving me the trajectory file(ordered.trr) but using
this file when i try g_velacc(velocity autocorrelation function) for
the water molecules, i am getting the result 'nan 0.000'. Later
w
Thank you, I have installed new version of gromacs4.0.5 and trjorder
works fine in giving me the trajectory file(ordered.trr) but using
this file when i try g_velacc(velocity autocorrelation function) for
the water molecules, i am getting the result 'nan 0.000'. Later
when i checked the trajec
Andrei Istrate wrote:
Andrei Istrate wrote:
I would like to modify the force constant of some distance constraints during
my MD.
I know this is not implemented in GROMACS and I'd like to modify the code.
I have read that it could be done in md.c, but I didn't find the variable dr_fc
in this fi
sunny mishra wrote:
I did the catting of lipid.gro and protein.gro and named it as
system.gro and then I inflated DSPC using INFLATEGRO script command and
also I am using the default value of 14A for cut off distance. So I
don't have much idea that after inflating the whole system if I run th
I did the catting of lipid.gro and protein.gro and named it as system.gro
and then I inflated DSPC using INFLATEGRO script command and also I am using
the default value of 14A for cut off distance. So I don't have much idea
that after inflating the whole system if I run the EM then protein and lipi
sunny mishra wrote:
Hi All,
I am having a trouble during EM step after I inflategro my lipid.gro
(protein is already centered).
After doing this :
Reading.
Hi All,
I am having a trouble during EM step after I inflategro my lipid.gro
(protein is already centered).
After doing this :
Reading.
Scaling
lipids
There are 512
lipids...
with 14 atoms per
lipid..
Determining upper and lower leaflet...
240 lipids in the upper...
272 lipids in th
Paymon Pirzadeh wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the tip. It worked on the command line and I had 3000 frames.
But when I fed the file to VMD, it showed only 1800 frames!? Although
the initial and final configurations looked correct. I still am not sure
what possibly goes wrong!?
VMD is not an appr
>Andrei Istrate wrote:
>>
>> I would like to modify the force constant of some distance constraints
>> during my MD.
>>I know this is not implemented in GROMACS and I'd like to modify the code.
>> I have read that it could be done in md.c, but I didn't find the variable
>> dr_fc in this file.
>W
Apparently you are right! But my desktop has 4GB RAM, and to be honest,
when I load normal trajectories (I know they are smaller in size) but I
have not seen such issue in almost 60% increase in RAM occupation by
VMD. Normally I load 1000 frames, and now I want 3000 frames. Why should
it run to suc
On Nov 2, 2009, at 18:13, Paymon Pirzadeh wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the tip. It worked on the command line and I had 3000
frames.
But when I fed the file to VMD, it showed only 1800 frames!? Although
the initial and final configurations looked correct. I still am not
sure
what possibly
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the tip. It worked on the command line and I had 3000 frames.
But when I fed the file to VMD, it showed only 1800 frames!? Although
the initial and final configurations looked correct. I still am not sure
what possibly goes wrong!?
Payman
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 10:50 +, TJ
Hi Gromacs User's,
In the normal mode analysis if I get the first 6 eigenfrequency zero
then I can think that the the protein is properly energy minimized.
Thank you
Abhijit
___
gmx-users mai
Hi Justin,
thanks for your answer
Justin A. Lemkul ha scritto:
>> I am using g_mindist to see how close get C-alphas to each other in my
>> chains. What I do is selecting C-alpha two times when prompted. I have
>> only a quick question, just to be sure: The script doesn't take into
>> account the
Hey,
I'm still working on the system where I pull two flexible diamod slabs in
opposite
direction and study the distance dependent speed of the water in
between. I attached the mdp file below. The system is scaled extremely
in z and pressure looks wrong as well (see attached graph of both).
There
hi,
I am simulating a protein complex. The peptide in the complex has PRO at the
N-terminal.
I run pdb2gmx and choose PRO-NH as the cap for the respective N-terminal.
pdb2gmx_4mpi -f xyz.pdb -o -ter -ignh -o conf.gro
Select N-terminus type (start)
0: PRO-NH2+
1: PRO-NH
2: NH3+
3: None
1
N-t
You should use the -settime option, I think it should solve your problem.
Tom
--On Monday, November 02, 2009 00:21:31 -0800 Payman Pirzadeh
wrote:
Your second guess is correct! I used grompp to restart (I had thought it
might provide me with the chance to change things if needed). I was
sur
20 matches
Mail list logo