Dear GROMACS users,
I have got a problem while running a simulated anealing simulations, using
GROMACS 3.3.3 version, of pure water:
the task:
I want to cool the system (water- 500 molecules) from 360 K to 0K in 100ps time
( fast cooling). For that I used the following script:
title
How can I obtain normal frequencies and normal modes? How are normal
frequencies and normal modes connected with eigenvalues and eigenvectors?
Calculation of the system of 3000 atoms with g_nmeig gives 3000 eigenvectors
which consists of 3000 coords instead of 9000*9000, why?
_
Is there any tool to create OPLS topology or obtain charges or is there any
library of such topologies (compound of interest: BCL (bacteriochlorophyll) and
lycopene? Can I use charges from Amber in OPLS? Thanks in advance.
___
gmx-users mailing list
Lee Soin wrote:
By invoking "uname -a":
Linux sgi4700 2.6.16.46-0.12-default #1 SMP Thu May 17 14:00:09 UTC 2007
ia64 ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux
I don't know any other command to retrieve system information.
Hmm, that looks like an SGI Altix 4700. IA64 kernels work on those
machines. There have be
By invoking "uname -a":
Linux sgi4700 2.6.16.46-0.12-default #1 SMP Thu May 17 14:00:09 UTC 2007
ia64 ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux
I don't know any other command to retrieve system information.
2008/10/27 Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Lee Soin wrote:
>
>> Everything works fine by setting NOASSEMBLYL
Hi Mark,
I have tried a lot but it still did not work. I just ran a similar case whose
file content is similar to what I have right now and it worked , while this
always failed.
I will post what I have to you.
Thank you for your help.
Yang
From: [E
Lee Soin wrote:
Everything works fine by setting NOASSEMBLYLOOPS. Thanks!
OK. These loops mean GROMACS will run much slower than if one of the
optimized sets is used. Please post some fine details of the processor
and hardware so there's a chance of working out how to avoid this
problem for
Hi,
I haven't really checked how it is with the new version (and you're
not telling which version you're using anyway), but grompp used to get
confused with multiple molecules and only report the charge on one of
them. You can check the total charge from the .tpr file with (bash
command line):
gm
shahrbanoo karbalaee wrote:
Dear justin
ok.you areright.if I add another cl- ,it will negative than more.I
know my peptide of charge is +1.please tell me no problem if with
warning continue.
I'm not clear which warning you're referring to. If you're being told you have
a non-zero charge,
Dear justin
ok.you areright.if I add another cl- ,it will negative than more.I
know my peptide of charge is +1.please tell me no problem if with
warning continue.
--best
sh-karbalaee
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs
shahrbanoo karbalaee wrote:
Dear
thanks for your answer. I did as you tell me about usingcapital
letter .about charge I guess it related to tfe and protonated amino
acid.after change it I still have this warning.
Then it's not case sensitivity, but what Mark told you is still
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:12:26 +0330
"hazizian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi gromacs users
I have done Position restrain for 50 ps.
after it had finished, I checked the rmsd for confident that rms reached to
it's equilibrate mode. When I check it by g_rms command and select system
subgroup, I
Everything works fine by setting NOASSEMBLYLOOPS. Thanks!
2008/10/26 Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Lee Soin wrote:
>
>> Single CPU run. These are the last lines of the log file:
>>
>
> Configuring nonbonded kernels...
>> Testing ia64 CPU family...Unknown Itanium
>> You might want to test th
Hi gromacs users
I have done Position restrain for 50 ps.
after it had finished, I checked the rmsd for confident that rms reached to
it's equilibrate mode. When I check it by g_rms command and select system
subgroup, I find that it had not reached to equilibria, but after I check
It by p
Dear
thanks for your answer. I did as you tell me about usingcapital
letter .about charge I guess it related to tfe and protonated amino
acid.after change it I still have this warning.
best
--
sh-karbalaee
___
gmx-users mailing listg
Hi,
It is not the problem of your command line. It is related to how index
file is used with grompp. In general, there are pre-defined groups -
protein, non-protein, protein-H, etc; and there are user-defined
groups. In your case, Protein1 and TOYPEP are both user-defined groups.
So did you mi
Mark Abraham wrote:
shahrbanoo karbalaee wrote:
hi justin
I have a file tfe peptide water,cl .I minimized it and I want to
preequilbrate it.when I do the grompp I get 1 warning:
calling /lib/cpp...
processing topology...
Generated 165 of the 1596 non-bonded parameter combinations
Exclu
Lee Soin wrote:
Single CPU run. These are the last lines of the log file:
Configuring nonbonded kernels...
Testing ia64 CPU family...Unknown Itanium
You might want to test the speed without assembly kernels
by setting the NOASSEMBLYLOOPS environment variable.
Try that... My guess is that the
shahrbanoo karbalaee wrote:
hi justin
I have a file tfe peptide water,cl .I minimized it and I want to
preequilbrate it.when I do the grompp I get 1 warning:
calling /lib/cpp...
processing topology...
Generated 165 of the 1596 non-bonded parameter combinations
Excluding 3 bonded neighbour
Single CPU run. These are the last lines of the log file:
PLEASE READ AND CITE THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE
U. Essman, L. Perela, M. L. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee and L. G. Pedersen
A smooth particle mesh Ewald method
J. Chem. Phys. 103 (1995) pp. 8577-8592
--- Thank You
hi justin
I have a file tfe peptide water,cl .I minimized it and I want to
preequilbrate it.when I do the grompp I get 1 warning:
calling /lib/cpp...
processing topology...
Generated 165 of the 1596 non-bonded parameter combinations
Excluding 3 bonded neighbours for Protein_A 1
turning all
21 matches
Mail list logo