Re: [gmx-users] Color in wheel

2008-02-21 Thread Mark Abraham
Hwankyu Lee wrote: Dear GMX-users, In "wheel" (helical projection tool), can I make colors for some residues? Besides gray for hydrophobic residues, I also want to make positive charged residues in blue, and negative charged residues in red. Thank you for your help in advance. Not without

[gmx-users] Color in wheel

2008-02-21 Thread Hwankyu Lee
Dear GMX-users, In "wheel" (helical projection tool), can I make colors for some residues? Besides gray for hydrophobic residues, I also want to make positive charged residues in blue, and negative charged residues in red. Thank you for your help in advance. best, Hwankyu. _

[gmx-users] Re: gmx-users Digest, Vol 46, Issue 67

2008-02-21 Thread sudheer babu
for both popc and protein > like > below mentioned here? > in " .top " file > ; Include Position restraint file > #ifdef POSRES > #include "lip_posre.itp" > #include "posre.itp" > #endif > > or any other way to do position restrain for both.

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM nonbonded parameters and grompp output

2008-02-21 Thread Mark Abraham
Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Quoting Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Justin A. Lemkul wrote: The ffcharmmnb.itp file is incomplete, and I suspect ffcharmmbon.itp is as well. Any idea what's going on? No, since you haven't said why you think they're incomplete :-) Sorry, I sent that a bit t

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM nonbonded parameters and grompp output

2008-02-21 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Quoting Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > >>> The ffcharmmnb.itp file is incomplete, and I suspect ffcharmmbon.itp is > as > >> well. > >>> Any idea what's going on? > >> No, since you haven't said why you think they're incomplete :-) > > > > Sorry, I sent that a bit

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM nonbonded parameters and grompp output

2008-02-21 Thread Mark Abraham
Justin A. Lemkul wrote: The ffcharmmnb.itp file is incomplete, and I suspect ffcharmmbon.itp is as well. Any idea what's going on? No, since you haven't said why you think they're incomplete :-) Sorry, I sent that a bit too quickly, didn't I? I suspect ffcharmmnb.itp is incomplete because

[gmx-users] Free energy for charged molecules with PME

2008-02-21 Thread Anirban Mudi
dear gmx users Any rigorous approach available currently to solve the problems mentioned in the link below ? http://www.mail-archive.com/gmx-users@gromacs.org/msg03792.html Is gromacs 4.0 going to have a way to deal with them ? Sorry to bother if a solution has been posted already and I have mi

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM nonbonded parameters and grompp output

2008-02-21 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Quoting Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > Thanks for the detailed and informative reply, Mark (as always). I have > decided > > there is probably something fundamentally wrong with what I've been doing. > I've > > been at this for several months, every time I get a f

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM nonbonded parameters and grompp output

2008-02-21 Thread Mark Abraham
Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Thanks for the detailed and informative reply, Mark (as always). I have decided there is probably something fundamentally wrong with what I've been doing. I've been at this for several months, every time I get a few free minutes from my main work, so I lost track of what

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM nonbonded parameters and grompp output

2008-02-21 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Thanks for the detailed and informative reply, Mark (as always). I have decided there is probably something fundamentally wrong with what I've been doing. I've been at this for several months, every time I get a few free minutes from my main work, so I lost track of what I did at the very beginn

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM nonbonded parameters and grompp output

2008-02-21 Thread Mark Abraham
Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Hi all, As a number of others have attempted, I am exploring the use of the CHARMM force fields in Gromacs. I have read about a number of difficulties throughout the list archive, but I am seeing something that thusfar it seems no one has reported, regarding nonbonded pa

Re: [gmx-users]build topology file for a molecule define with new residues

2008-02-21 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > hi all, > i would like make MD simulation of heparin. the only files i have is the > pdb file from protein data bank but residues in this file are unknown by > gromacs. so i have to build the topology file. Is anyone had ever built > topology files and parameters files

Re: [gmx-users]build topology file for a molecule define with new residues

2008-02-21 Thread cilpa
hi all, i would like make MD simulation of heparin. the only files i have is the pdb file from protein data bank but residues in this file are unknown by gromacs. so i have to build the topology file. Is anyone had ever built topology files and parameters files [or have any ideas] and could help in

Re: [gmx-users] CHARMM nonbonded parameters and grompp output

2008-02-21 Thread David van der Spoel
Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Hi all, As a number of others have attempted, I am exploring the use of the CHARMM force fields in Gromacs. I have read about a number of difficulties throughout the list archive, but I am seeing something that thusfar it seems no one has reported, regarding nonbonded pa

[gmx-users] CHARMM nonbonded parameters and grompp output

2008-02-21 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Hi all, As a number of others have attempted, I am exploring the use of the CHARMM force fields in Gromacs. I have read about a number of difficulties throughout the list archive, but I am seeing something that thusfar it seems no one has reported, regarding nonbonded parameters. Let me tell yo

[gmx-users] Re: T-Coupling and COM removal

2008-02-21 Thread Markus Miettinen
On Feb 20, 2008, at 19:36 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 4 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:15:33 -0800 From: "Ilya Chorny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [gmx-users] T-Coupling and COM removal To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain;

Re: [gmx-users] Building Topology with all hydrogens

2008-02-21 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Quoting Subhrangshu Supakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi All ! > I want to do a MD study of a few molecules in a box of sodium cetyl > sulphate. > I want the the topology Sod-cetyl-sulphate with all its hydrogens as without > that there would occur a mismatch > in the number of atoms in the system an

[gmx-users] Building Topology with all hydrogens

2008-02-21 Thread Subhrangshu Supakar
Hi All ! I want to do a MD study of a few molecules in a box of sodium cetyl sulphate. I want the the topology Sod-cetyl-sulphate with all its hydrogens as without that there would occur a mismatch in the number of atoms in the system and the number of atoms in the topology file. I tried the the du

Re: [gmx-users] problem about position restrain

2008-02-21 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Quoting sudheer babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi gmx users, > I am trying to run position restrain step for protein embedded in popc. is > it possible to do position restrain at a time for both popc and protein like > below mentioned here? > in " .top " file > ; Include Position restraint file > #if

[gmx-users] problem about position restrain

2008-02-21 Thread sudheer babu
Hi gmx users, I am trying to run position restrain step for protein embedded in popc. is it possible to do position restrain at a time for both popc and protein like below mentioned here? in " .top " file ; Include Position restraint file #ifdef POSRES #include "lip_posre.itp" #include "posre.itp"

Re: [gmx-users] Problem regarding tc_grps

2008-02-21 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Quoting sudheer babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dear gmx-users, > I am working on membrane proteins, I have done position restrain step > successfully but, I have doubt about that tc_grps how to use? I have > searched in gmx-archives regrading this problem , but I found controversial > answers like 1.

Re: [gmx-users] Strange dgdl-value together with lincs

2008-02-21 Thread Maik Goette
David, Berk, > Hold on, if you are doing this with hardcore, there is a singularity > in dG/dlambda. It won't be numerically integrable so whatever you > compute will be in error. See my recent JCP paper that I referred you > to before. thats what I thought. With the latest patched code, I get r

[gmx-users] problem with genion

2008-02-21 Thread Siavoush Dastmalchi
Hi again, The genion doesn't work. I issue the following: $ genion -s fullmd.tpr -random -nname Cl -nn 8 -o out.gro -p test.top -g genion.log and get the error massage of: Processing topology --- Program genion, VERSION 3.3.1 Source code

Re: [gmx-users] unfolding a protein

2008-02-21 Thread Xavier Periole
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:54:35 +0530 (IST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Siavoush Dastmalchi wrote: Hii!! The time scale you have chosen is very less to see unfolding in proteins of moderate length, because in such a short time u might be able to see just local disturbances only,

Re: [gmx-users] unfolding a protein

2008-02-21 Thread mon_sharma
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Siavoush Dastmalchi wrote: Hii!! The time scale you have chosen is very less to see unfolding in proteins of moderate length, because in such a short time u might be able to see just local disturbances only, even at temperature of 400K. You need to increase the production r

Re: [gmx-users] How to take snapshots every 1 nano-sec of a 30 nano-se simulation?

2008-02-21 Thread David van der Spoel
Anirban Ghosh wrote: Hi All, Can anyone tell me how to take snapshots every 1 nano-sec of a 30 nano-se simulation? Which command should I use in GROMACS and how? Any suggestion is welcome. Thanks trjconv Regards, *Anirban Ghosh* *M.Tech Bioinformatics* *University of Hyderabad * Projec

[gmx-users] How to take snapshots every 1 nano-sec of a 30 nano-se simulation?

2008-02-21 Thread Anirban Ghosh
Hi All, Can anyone tell me how to take snapshots every 1 nano-sec of a 30 nano-se simulation? Which command should I use in GROMACS and how? Any suggestion is welcome. Thanks Regards, Anirban Ghosh M.Tech Bioinformatics University of Hyderabad Project Trainee Centre For DNA Fingerprin