Frankie Montenegro wrote:
Hi everyone,
*/I have posted these few questions on the developers list few days ago
but didn't get any feedback. I'd really appreciate some input, I am
quite lost in gromacs (not so small) source tree. /*
I am trying to add a two-body bonded interaction, following a "
Hi everyone,
*I have posted these few questions on the developers list few days ago
but didn't get any feedback. I'd really appreciate some input, I am
quite lost in gromacs (not so small) source tree.*
I am trying to add a two-body bonded interaction, following a "list of
files to modify", given
Grace Li wrote:
Hi Gromacs users:
I was wondering if anyone has ran into the type of a problem where,
you're running a gromacs analysis tool, for example g_dist
g_dist -f traj.xtc -s traj.tpr -n index
and half way through reading frames, it just stops and hangs and does
not do anything at
pragya chohan wrote:
hi ... i want to start a simulation with asymmetric distribution of
water on the bilayer (upper leaftlet having more and lower one less).
has anyone ever encountered a paper with such a simulation. Is it possible?
Only when you don't use periodic boundary conditions. Then of
hi ... i want to start a simulation with asymmetric distribution of water on
the bilayer (upper leaftlet having more and lower one less). has anyone ever
encountered a paper with such a simulation. Is it possible?
Thanks for any help
__
Hi Gromacs users:
I was wondering if anyone has ran into the type of a problem where, you're
running a gromacs analysis tool, for example g_dist
g_dist -f traj.xtc -s traj.tpr -n index
and half way through reading frames, it just stops and hangs and does not do
anything at all.
I have ran into
Ananya Debnath wrote:
Hi,
I am a recent user of Gromacs. I tried to make initial configuration
of a bilayer in united atom model having Btmac, Stearyl alcohol and
water with packmol and then energy minimization with gromacs.
Initially I made a bilayer with gromos87 forcefield, ffgmx.itp, and
tha
Ananya Debnath wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone tell me whether gromacs writes coordinate in .gro file
with periodic boundary condition?
The coordinates are the coordinates. Whether you choose to interpret
them modulo some box is up to you and the software. Is this really the
question you meant to ask
In the last line.
Dr. Yuguang Mu
School of Biological Sciences
60 Nanyang Drive
Nanyang Technological Uiversity
Singapre
Tel: +65-63162885
email:ygmuATntu.edu.sg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ananya Debnath
Sent: Friday, November 23, 20
Hi,
Can anyone tell me whether gromacs writes coordinate in .gro file
with periodic boundary condition?
Thanks,
Ananya.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:42:45 +0100
"Xavier Periole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David is write, you need to rename the tpr files is the following cmd:
well, I believe David was right not write :))
mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -s XXX.tpr -replex 2500 -reseed -1 -multi 8
by
XXX0.tpr
XXX1.ptr
...
X
David is write, you need to rename the tpr files is the following cmd:
mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -s XXX.tpr -replex 2500 -reseed -1 -multi 8
by
XXX0.tpr
XXX1.ptr
...
XXX7.tpr
This time I used the following command line:
mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -s simul0.tpr -replex 2500 -reseed -1 -multi 8.
No, David gave a confusing hint.
If you files are called simul0.tpr simul1.tpr etc.
you should use mdrun -s simul.tpr
mdrun will add the numbers.
With 3.3 you do not need the multi option and -multi does not take an
argument
(but incorrect command line options to mdrun will be ignored).
My ori
This time I used the following command line:
mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -s simul0.tpr -replex 2500 -reseed -1 -multi 8.
I got the following error:
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 3.3.99_development_20070413
Source code file: gmxfio.c, line: 706
Can not open file:
simul0_md0.tpr
OZGE ENGIN wrote:
This time, I used the following command line:
mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -s simul0_md.tpr -replex 2500 -reseed -1 -multi 8
rename
rename your tpr files to
simul_md0.tpr
simul_md1.tpr
...
simul_md7.tpr
but I got the following error:
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 3.3.99_developmen
This time, I used the following command line:
mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -s simul0_md.tpr -replex 2500 -reseed -1 -multi 8
but I got the following error:
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 3.3.99_development_20070413
Source code file: gmxfio.c, line: 706
Can not open file:
simul00.tpr
-
Hi,
I am a recent user of Gromacs. I tried to make initial configuration
of a bilayer in united atom model having Btmac, Stearyl alcohol and
water with packmol and then energy minimization with gromacs.
Initially I made a bilayer with gromos87 forcefield, ffgmx.itp, and
that worked fine. With same
You need to supply the -np option.
In Gromacs 3.3 you don't need to set the -multi option,
and -multi does not take an argument.
If you use the CVS head branch, you need to set -np and -multi
both with an argument.
Berk.
From: "OZGE ENGIN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMA
Hi Berk,
I indicated the number of replicas with -multi option. In additon, I have
compiled Gromacs with MPI support.
I used the following command line:
mdrun -s simul0.tpr -multi 16 -reseed -1 -replex 2500
-Original Message-
From: "Berk Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gmx-users@gromacs.
From: "OZGE ENGIN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] problem with mdrun performing replica exchange MD
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:30:53 +0200
Hi All,
I am performing replica exchange molecular dynamics simulation(RE
Hi All,
I am performing replica exchange molecular dynamics simulation(REMD). I have 16
replicas each of which has a peptide with different conformation. After
obtaining .tpr files (at desired temperatures) for each replicas, I loaded them
via mdrun, but I got the following error:
Fatal error:
21 matches
Mail list logo