Re: [gmx-users] Performing simulation at air/water interface

2007-11-05 Thread Mark Abraham
OZGE ENGIN wrote: Thank you for your suggestion, but I have already tried it. If your system is periodic in (at least) the x direction, then your peptide hasn't moved out of the box. Play with the trjconv options until you find something that works. Mark

Re: [gmx-users] regarding continuation of a simulation

2007-11-05 Thread Mark Abraham
raghava alapati wrote: hi.. General i use " tpbconv " for continuing a simulation in a single node. Can i use the same command for continuing a simulation in parallel if so, how do i encounter the no. of processors to be used in parallel. No. tpbconv writes a continuation, which

Re: [gmx-users] problem with extended run using grompp

2007-11-05 Thread Mark Abraham
Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Try using 'tinit' instead of 't_init' ... and Sarbani should be checking his warnings from grompp, which would have been issued for the misspelled version. See http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Doing_Restarts#Using_grompp for general advice here. Mark _

[gmx-users] regarding continuation of a simulation

2007-11-05 Thread raghava alapati
hi.. General i use " tpbconv " for continuing a simulation in a single node. Can i use the same command for continuing a simulation in parallel if so, how do i encounter the no. of processors to be used in parallel. -- raghava alapati 804-677-5494 __

Re: [gmx-users] soft-core and coulomb transformation

2007-11-05 Thread David Mobley
Hi, > i am extremely sorry here.. i am plotting dg/dl vs lambda of reverse > transformation onto that of forward with both axes reversed. so i > should expect overlap. this is consistent with whatever you are saying. i > am sorry for negligence and confusion. And taking the negative? > >> but wh

Re: [gmx-users] soft-core and coulomb transformation

2007-11-05 Thread bharat v. adkar
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, David Mobley wrote: Hi, it is fairly straight FORWARD.. forward is from state A to state B, and reverse is from state B to state A. Say for example, forward transformation is going from ethane to methane. in this step, i define three of the terminal hydrogen on say C2, with

Re: [gmx-users] soft-core and coulomb transformation

2007-11-05 Thread David Mobley
Hi, > it is fairly straight FORWARD.. forward is from state A to state B, and > reverse is from state B to state A. Say for example, forward > transformation is going from ethane to methane. in this step, i define > three of the terminal hydrogen on say C2, with zero charges and C2 with > charge o

Re: Re: [gmx-users] Performing simulation at air/water interface

2007-11-05 Thread OZGE ENGIN
Thank you for your suggestion, but I have already tried it. -Original Message- From: "Pedro Alexandre de Araújo Gomes Lapido Loureiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 16:33:26 -0200 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Performing simulation at air/wa

Re: [gmx-users] Performing simulation at air/water interface

2007-11-05 Thread Pedro Alexandre de Araújo Gomes Lapido Loureiro
Regarding the peptide moving out of the box, it is only a visualization artifact. Try trjconv -pbc inbox. 2007/11/5, OZGE ENGIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi all, > > I am performing a simulation of peptide at air/water interface. > > The box vectors are: x,y,z where 2x=2y=z. After loading the traj

Re: [gmx-users] soft-core and coulomb transformation

2007-11-05 Thread bharat v. adkar
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, David Mobley wrote: Hi, Everything goes fine till this point. Now, i do reverse transformations to check for hysteresis. For vdw transformations, i get almost perfect overlap of dG/dlambda vs lambda for forward and reverse transformations, but for coloumb transformations, i

[gmx-users] Performing simulation at air/water interface

2007-11-05 Thread OZGE ENGIN
Hi all, I am performing a simulation of peptide at air/water interface. The box vectors are: x,y,z where 2x=2y=z. After loading the trajectory to the vmd, I realized that water molecules moved out of bulk water in the z direction: into the vacuum. However, the peptide also moved out of the bulk

Re: [gmx-users] Simulating Infinite Nanotube

2007-11-05 Thread Patrick Lafond
Robert, Thank you for your help, and yes I am absolutely sure that the terminal carbons are specified as bonded in the topology file. I have used VMD and done calculations by hand to ensure their distance is correct. I am not applying any pressure coupling and I have also made sure that the tube

Re: [gmx-users] soft-core and coulomb transformation

2007-11-05 Thread David Mobley
Hi, > Everything goes fine till this point. Now, i do reverse transformations to > check for hysteresis. For vdw transformations, i get almost perfect > overlap of dG/dlambda vs lambda for forward and reverse transformations, > but for coloumb transformations, if i don't use soft-core potentials,

Re: [gmx-users] problem with extended run using grompp

2007-11-05 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Try using 'tinit' instead of 't_init' -Justin Quoting sarbani chattopadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >   > Hi, >I used 'grompp' to get the '.tpr' file for extending my run. I had > provided the trajectory file > , energy file for the previous run and gave the value of the last step of the > pre

[gmx-users] problem with extended run using grompp

2007-11-05 Thread sarbani chattopadhyay
  Hi, I used 'grompp' to get the '.tpr' file for extending my run. I had provided the trajectory file , energy file for the previous run and gave the value of the last step of the previous run for the 'init_step ' and the last time step for the ' t_init' and turned 'unconstrained start'= y

[gmx-users] Problem of mdrun compiled by different gcc version

2007-11-05 Thread YuXiang
Dear all: I have a problem when I was running mdrun on different computers. I made a .tpr file including coordinate and velocity of each atom from a crash of mdrun and upload it to four computers whose distribution version of linux and gcc were as follows: computer A: Redhat

Re: [gmx-users] gcc problem

2007-11-05 Thread David van der Spoel
余翔 wrote: > Dear all: > > I have a problem when I was running mdrun on different computers. I > made a .tpr file including coordinate and velocity of each atom from a crash > of mdrun and upload it to four computers whose distribution version of linux > and gcc were as follows: > co