hi,
I want to extend my run, for which I will have to use 'tpbconv'
command.But this time I
want to change the frequencies in which the energies,velocities and 'xyz'
coordinates will be
written to the trajectory file. Is there any way to do it?
Thanks in advance.___
hi
I was trying to run pdb2gmx command for gramicidin and noticed it has some
D-amino acids. Reading the earlier mail wjich states that:
It's not too difficult to add a new residue to the topology database.
Have a look in the file ff.rtp, where is the force field
you are using.
You can proba
Craig Schwartz wrote:
Hey Gromacs Users,
I am trying to convert the zwitterionic form of glycine into a top
and gro file from the pdb, while I appear to be able to do this with
some efficiency by PRODRG is there a way to do this that keeps all my
hydrogens in the same locations?
Yup. Se
Hey Gromacs Users,
I am trying to convert the zwitterionic form of glycine into a top and
gro file from the pdb, while I appear to be able to do this with some
efficiency by PRODRG is there a way to do this that keeps all my hydrogens
in the same locations? This gets more complicated when I t
Huey Ling Tan wrote:
Dear gromacs users,
I am simulating 2 identical peptide chains in a simulation box with
water as solvent. To find the the equilibration, I wanted to calculate
the energy of the peptide chains, separately, and then compare between
them.
To do that, I changed the en
himanshu khandelia wrote:
I get bad scaling with 8 cpus.
http://www.gromacs.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=84
I'm not seeing how openmpi (the implementation) can be
allocating cpus "depending on what options gromacs was originally
compiled with".
I do not see immediately how either,
Huey Ling Tan wrote:
The reason I want to do this is to compare the energy of both the
peptide chains to find out whether they has reached equilibrium or not
(it should be not much different between them as they are identical
peptide chains). Therefore, I think by comparing the total energy for
I get bad scaling with 8 cpus.
http://www.gromacs.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=84
> I'm not seeing how openmpi (the implementation) can be
> allocating cpus "depending on what options gromacs was originally
> compiled with".
I do not see immediately how either, but just seemed logical
Dear gromacs users,
I am simulating 2 identical peptide chains in a simulation box with water
as solvent. To find the the equilibration, I wanted to calculate the energy
of the peptide chains, separately, and then compare between them.
To do that, I changed the energygrps and tc-grps in my
himanshu khandelia wrote:
Hi Mark,
I do not want to request two separate 1-node jobs, so that I can make
maximum use of the MAUI queue algorithm on our local cluster, which
sometimes favors jobs which utilize more resources.
So what about using 8-cpu jobs?
I posted on this list, because some
Michel Cuendet wrote:
Dear David and Berk,
I am investigating further to understand why I don't get the same
energies with -rerun. I will report next week.
if you are using xtc files you will never get the same energies as in
the original run because of the reduced precision in these files.
Dear David and Berk,
I am investigating further to understand why I don't get the same
energies with -rerun. I will report next week.
Thanks for your replies,
Michel
I just checked the 3.3.1 source code in md.c and the box is copied
from the xtc file.
I don't know where your problems could
Hi Mark,
I do not want to request two separate 1-node jobs, so that I can make
maximum use of the MAUI queue algorithm on our local cluster, which
sometimes favors jobs which utilize more resources.
I posted on this list, because someone here might have faced a similar
problem before, and because
The reason I want to do this is to compare the energy of both the peptide
chains to find out whether they has reached equilibrium or not (it should be
not much different between them as they are identical peptide chains).
Therefore, I think by comparing the total energy for each of the peptide
chai
himanshu khandelia wrote:
Hi,
I am requesting 2 4-cpu nodes on a cluster using PBS. I want to run a
separate GMX simulation on each 4-cpu node. However, on 2 nodes, the
speed for each simulation decreases (50 to 100%) if compared to a
simulation which runs in a job which requests only one node.
Huey Ling Tan wrote:
Hi all,
I am simulating 2 peptide chains in a box. May I know is it possible
to calculate energy profile of each of the peptide chains with time steps?
How will you define the energy of a peptide chain, and what will it tell
you?
Mark
___
Hi all,
I am simulating 2 peptide chains in a box. May I know is it possible to
calculate energy profile of each of the peptide chains with time steps?
Thanks in advance.
--
Best regards,
Huey Ling
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs
Hi,
I am requesting 2 4-cpu nodes on a cluster using PBS. I want to run a
separate GMX simulation on each 4-cpu node. However, on 2 nodes, the
speed for each simulation decreases (50 to 100%) if compared to a
simulation which runs in a job which requests only one node. I am
guessing this is becaus
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:36:33PM +, Moutusi Manna wrote:
> Hi
> I want to perform peptide + popc membrane simulation. I download
> popc128a.pdb from
> (http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca/index.php?page=Structures_and_Topologies).
> Before I introduce the peptide into the membrane, the wate
I just checked the 3.3.1 source code in md.c and the box is copied
from the xtc file.
I don't know where your problems could come from.
Berk.
From: "David Mobley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Subject: Re: [gmx-users]
20 matches
Mail list logo