raja wrote:
Hi gmxions,
There are many references, say that Zn2+ partial charge should be
reduced to ~0.7 rather than the force field default value of 2. In line
with that there are many values published for distributed charge in its
surrounding ligand atoms in compensation for loss of positive c
E.Elavazhagan wrote:
Hai folks,
Thanks for ur previous valuable suggestions.
On executing the mdrun command we get the following error.
mdrun -v -s pr -e pr -o pr -c after_pr -nice +5 -g pr_log
---
Program mdrun, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code fil
Hi gmxions,
There are many references, say that Zn2+ partial charge should be
reduced to ~0.7 rather than the force field default value of 2. In line
with that there are many values published for distributed charge in its
surrounding ligand atoms in compensation for loss of positive charge of
Zn. N
Hai folks,
Thanks for ur previous valuable suggestions.
On executing the mdrun command we get the following error.
mdrun -v -s pr -e pr -o pr -c after_pr -nice +5 -g
pr_log
---
Program mdrun, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: clincs.c, line: 5
陳 星男 wrote:
> Hi :
> I want to assign the initial velocities at 300K for one group, 10K for
> the rest. Could it be done by set "gen_vel = 300 10" in .mdp file?
> Thanks
No. Your best chance without doing any code hacking is to equilibrate
with those groups coupled to different temperatures,
Hi :
I want to assign the initial velocities at 300K for one group, 10K for the
rest.
Could it be done by set "gen_vel = 300 10" in .mdp file?
Thanks
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx
raja wrote:
Hi gmxions,
I want to use charge information contained in itp file produced in
gromacs for docking purpose (Autodock). Kindly share a script if anyone
written to convert information content from gromacs protein's itp (for
charge) and gro (coordinate) information to autodock pdbqs or p
Dmitriy Golubobsky wrote:
Dear Guru,
i need an advice.
i create 3 resudues for my polymer. ( begin-monomer, middle-monomer,
end-monomer)
optimize geometry and charges in gaussin 6-31G.
formalize topology for OPLS force-field.
but, i've got a question
have i to do RESP of the charges of my monom
Dear all:
Thank you very much,Emily Walton!
Thank for all here!
My pull.ppa file is shown in the following:
verbose = no
runtype = afm
ngroups = 1
group_1 = Lig
reference_group = Protein
reftype = com
pulldim = Y Y Y
;
afm_rate1
Hi gmxusers,
I am a new user of gromacs. I completed a MD run of my
protein in a solvent box.
Now I want to calculate the number of solvent
molecules (molecules/cc) present arround a shell of
0.6nm from my protein (or sidechains).
Please help me.
Thanks in advance
Chiradip Chatterjee
Chiradip Chat
Hi Zhang,Please have a look at you config.log and see the error message(s) therein. Most likely, it's a problem with the access to the shared libraries: libgm.soI am forwarding your message to the list so that you can get further help.best,pb-- Forwarded message --From: qfzhang <[EM
Hi gmxions,
I want to use charge information contained in itp file produced in
gromacs for docking purpose (Autodock). Kindly share a script if anyone
written to convert information content from gromacs protein's itp (for
charge) and gro (coordinate) information to autodock pdbqs or pdbq
formated o
Dear gromacs users,
I'm a new PhD student in Erik Lindahl's group and we are currently
working on an "official" implementation of the charmm ff in gromacs
which also supports CMAP. There's still some more work needed on the
CMAP part but we intend to have a (thoroughly) tested version of the
prote
Dear Guru,
i need an advice.
i create 3 resudues for my polymer. ( begin-monomer, middle-monomer,
end-monomer)
optimize geometry and charges in gaussin 6-31G.
formalize topology for OPLS force-field.
but, i've got a question
have i to do RESP of the charges of my monomers according to ff or not?
i
14 matches
Mail list logo