> Hi:>
> Two melt models were built for polyethylene (PE) and >
polyvinylmethylether (PVME) melt with PBC condition .> > The
density of both melt model agree with experimenal value well.But > when
one check the radius of gyration (Rg) of them, both of them were > too
small to acce
zzhwise1 wrote:
> about the second question,is that ,when i use the md as integrator,the
> feedback show the atomnumber of gro was not the same as top which show 0
> atom? but when i use the l-bfgs as integrator, there was no wrong,and
> goes smoothly!
> and i never know why!
Neither will we
about the second question,is that ,when i use the md as integrator,the feedback show the atomnumber of gro was not the same as top which show 0 atom? but when i use the l-bfgs as integrator, there was no wrong,and goes smoothly!
and i never know why!
3G 时 代 来 临 了,坚 决 对 传 统 邮 箱 说 不 !
主月 :) wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Two melt models were built for polyethylene (PE) and
> polyvinylmethylether (PVME) melt with PBC condition .
>
> The density of both melt model agree with experimenal value well.But
> when one check the radius of gyration (Rg) of them, both of them were
> too small to
Camilo Calderon wrote:
Hi all!
I am new to the GROMACS-world, and I am mystified.
How do I implement the 3 body potentials advertised in sec. 4.2.8 and
sec. 4.2.9 of the GROMACS 3.3 manual?
Right now I have the following:
[ cross_cross_bond ]
;ai aj funct r1e r2e krr
[ cross_bond_angl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Appologies, two entries are required (the first is for ACE and the
second is for NAC):
[ dihedraltypes ]
; ijkl func coefficients
CT C N CT_23 30.28798 -4.81160 -25.47638
0.0 0.0 0.0 For ACE (Sept2006) ad
Hi:
Two melt models were built for
polyethylene (PE) and polyvinylmethylether (PVME) melt with PBC
condition .
The density of both melt model agree with
experimenal value well.But when one check the radius of gyration (Rg) of them,
both of them were too small to accept as foll
zzhwise1 wrote:
> good everyone
>i have 2 questions :
> 1) when i optimized my system of CH3(CH2)13COOH chains with l-bfgs for
> 5000steps,but it stopped at 467th step,and i found the conformation
> break,8chains'lost the C-OH bonds,why there was this and what cause
> this?was this the wrong
good everyone
i have 2 questions :
1) when i optimized my system of CH3(CH2)13COOH chains with l-bfgs for 5000steps,but it stopped at 467th step,and i found the conformation break,8chains'lost the C-OH bonds,why there was this and what cause this?was this the wrong itp or mdp?
2) when i change t
Hi,
I'm using openmpi on our 24-nodes 2 cores each cluster without any problem
so far. I run my jobs under torque and I did not change any of default
settings. With my system it scales rather well on 4 nodes, but I have no
problems with running more.
Grzegorz Wieczorek
Department of Bioinfor
10 matches
Mail list logo