Hi,
thanks for your interest in GLPI.
A similar bug report could be found here :
http://www.glpi-project.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=22834
The proposed solution : replace \w by \p{L}
Could you test it and validate the proposed solution ?
For the second problem, you are right about addslashes.
Th
2011/2/3 MoYo
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your interest in GLPI.
> A similar bug report could be found here :
> http://www.glpi-project.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=22834
>
>
> The proposed solution : replace \w by \p{L}
> Could you test it and validate the proposed solution ?
>
No, without changes this
Le 03/02/2011 12:20, Denis Linvinus a écrit :
2011/2/3 MoYo mailto:m...@indepnet.net>>
Hi,
thanks for your interest in GLPI.
A similar bug report could be found here :
http://www.glpi-project.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=22834
The proposed solution : replace \w by \p{L}
2011/2/3 MoYo
> Le 03/02/2011 12:20, Denis Linvinus a écrit :
>
>
>
> 2011/2/3 MoYo
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for your interest in GLPI.
>> A similar bug report could be found here :
>> http://www.glpi-project.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=22834
>>
>>
>> The proposed solution : replace \w by \p{L}
>>
Hello,
We enter in beta-test period of the 0.80 (february 2011).
For this occasion, we invite you to thoroughly test the beta version of GLPI 0.80 by
participating in the "bug hunter" contest.
The contest aims to reward the best beta testers. The 15 best will receive the
following awards:
- F
Salut,
Ticket créé.
https://forge.indepnet.net/issues/2635
On doit pouvoir faire en sorte de garder la compatibilité existante en
ajoutant cette gestion sous forme de tableau.
++
Julien
Le 28/01/2011 15:36, François LEGASTELOIS a écrit :
Posted by *Tsmr* on January 27, 2011 - 13:06:
On
