github-actions[bot] commented on PR #15832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15832#issuecomment-3091393278
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or comment or
alamb commented on PR #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/91#issuecomment-3090552542
Amazing -- thank you @Omega359 -- I plan to review this carefully in the
next hour or so (when I am on the train)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
Omega359 commented on PR #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/91#issuecomment-3090557283
I hope to start filling out the sections, fixme's, etc this weekend. I would
really like to get the clickbench comparison over time done for this release as
well but that requires so
mbutrovich commented on PR #1992:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1992#issuecomment-3090572205
Should we set this to draft as we discuss the design going forward?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
alamb commented on PR #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/91#issuecomment-3090618288
>
I hope to start filling out the sections, fixme's, etc this weekend. I would
really like to get the clickbench comparison over time done for this release as
well but that requires
alamb commented on code in PR #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/91#discussion_r2216920283
##
content/blog/2025-07-25-datafusion-49.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+ ---
+layout: post
+title: Apache DataFusion 49.0
rthummaluru opened a new pull request, #16823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16823
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #16712.
## Rationale for this change
Rust 1.86 stabilized f64::next_up() and f32::next_up() methods, along with
their next_down() counter
alamb commented on issue #16235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3090483735
> Skeleton of a blog post started with what I think are the highlights. feel
free to edit/etc
>
>
https://github.com/Omega359/datafusion-site/blob/df_49/content/blog/2025-0
Adez017 commented on PR #15832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15832#issuecomment-3091662660
hi @alamb please have a look on this
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
duongcongtoai commented on issue #5492:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5492#issuecomment-3091907474
in case anyone interested, I an @irenjj are working on this on a
[fork](https://github.com/duongcongtoai/arrow-datafusion)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
yoavcloud opened a new pull request, #1958:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1958
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
comphead commented on PR #16813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16813#issuecomment-3090822322
> Makes sense. Could you add a test?
Added
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
comphead merged PR #16813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16813
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
comphead commented on PR #16787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16787#issuecomment-3091241093
I'm just wondering should it be Gist instead? 🤔
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abo
parthchandra commented on code in PR #2032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2032#discussion_r2217038689
##
common/src/main/java/org/apache/comet/parquet/BatchReader.java:
##
@@ -183,9 +183,7 @@ public BatchReader(
this.taskContext = TaskContext$.MODULE$
huaxingao commented on code in PR #2032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2032#discussion_r2217013989
##
common/src/main/java/org/apache/comet/parquet/BatchReader.java:
##
@@ -183,9 +183,7 @@ public BatchReader(
this.taskContext = TaskContext$.MODULE$.ge
xudong963 commented on issue #15774:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15774#issuecomment-3091410744
> [@xudong963](https://github.com/xudong963) I see not activity on this
issue or either of the PR opened. Is this issue available, can i work on this?
Yes, it's availabl
rthummaluru commented on issue #16712:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16712#issuecomment-3090726399
Just submitted the PR, please let me know if there's anything that needs to
be changed or corrected. Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
2010YOUY01 commented on code in PR #16819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16819#discussion_r2217129149
##
benchmarks/src/nlj.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements. See t
2010YOUY01 commented on code in PR #16819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16819#discussion_r2217129111
##
benchmarks/src/nlj.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements. See t
2010YOUY01 commented on PR #16819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16819#issuecomment-3091474891
> @2010YOUY01 Thanks for providing such a comprehensive set of benchmark
cases. It would be even better if it could also output the memory consumption
for each SQL query, just lik
2010YOUY01 commented on PR #16819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16819#issuecomment-3091475027
Thank you for the review @UBarney @jonathanc-n
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #16820:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16820#issuecomment-3091476899
Thank you for filing the ticket!
> [@2010YOUY01](https://github.com/2010YOUY01) This can be marked as a good
first issue, lets new contributors for joins to learn more
findepi merged PR #16539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16539
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafu
findepi closed issue #16531: Different result of decimal to timestamp cast when
source value is constant
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16531
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
Omega359 opened a new pull request, #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/91
Posting as a draft as per @alamb's request @
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3090483735
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
mbutrovich merged PR #2010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2010
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...
comphead commented on issue #1916:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1916#issuecomment-3090691128
Depends on https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1993
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
alamb commented on issue #16235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3090505894
Current status:
1. I created https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/branch-49
2. There is a PR to update the version and changelog here:
https://github.com/apache/datafus
parthchandra commented on issue #2035:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2035#issuecomment-3090665794
With the EventDate clause we may have a second problem.
```
scala> spark.sql("SELECT TraficSourceID, SearchEngineID, AdvEngineID, CASE
WHEN (SearchEngineID =
parthchandra commented on issue #2035:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2035#issuecomment-3090666597
The query succeeds with `native_iceberg_compat` and `--conf
spark.comet.scan.allowIncompatible=true`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
alamb commented on PR #16625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16625#issuecomment-3090664781
> @ozankabak @alamb can you please help me understand where you would want
to go with this?
I think supporting multiple ordered array_agg aggregations makes sense to
me; I have
parthchandra commented on issue #2035:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2035#issuecomment-3090665542
I can reproduce the above problem only after removing this part`EventDate
>= '2013-07-01' AND EventDate <= '2013-07-31'` from the query. (With the clause
all records
alamb commented on PR #16762:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16762#issuecomment-3090672449
I am sorry @haohuaijin -- I will review this more carefully soon. I just
need to sit down and think through the details to make sure it doesn't have any
correctness problems
--
Thi
gabotechs opened a new pull request, #16816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16816
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
Follow up on:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16346
- https://github.com
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #16815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16815
Bumps [aws-credential-types](https://github.com/smithy-lang/smithy-rs) from
1.2.3 to 1.2.4.
Commits
See full diff in https://github.com/smithy-lang/smithy-rs/commits";>compar
codecov-commenter commented on PR #2028:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2028#issuecomment-3088718229
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2028?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
xudong963 commented on issue #16235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3088863934
@alamb I'm busy recently, if you don't get a chance to do it on Friday, I
can start doing it on Saturday.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To res
findepi commented on issue #16677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16677#issuecomment-3088759771
Worth noting
- #16781
That PR adds missing equality implementation to many functions and improves
default implementation to consider type_id and aliases. It well
findepi commented on PR #16681:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16681#issuecomment-3088768792
@alamb https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16781 aims to solve
immediate obvious problem - incorrect implementation of equality for stateful
functions managed in this repo. Th
findepi commented on PR #16539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16539#issuecomment-3088779085
@alamb PTAL
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
findepi merged PR #16781:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16781
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafu
m09526 opened a new issue, #16817:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16817
The parquet_index.rs example mentions "the (forthcoming)
`advanced_parquet_index` example". This example now exists!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
andygrove commented on code in PR #2010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2010#discussion_r2215684316
##
native/proto/src/proto/expr.proto:
##
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ message Expr {
ArrayInsert array_insert = 58;
MathExpr integral_divide = 59;
ToPret
akupchinskiy commented on code in PR #2010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2010#discussion_r2215762841
##
native/proto/src/proto/expr.proto:
##
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ message Expr {
ArrayInsert array_insert = 58;
MathExpr integral_divide = 59;
ToP
alamb commented on issue #15338:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15338#issuecomment-3089248741
@kosiew filed a ticket that I think describes a solution to this problem:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16579
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
crepererum commented on code in PR #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16456#discussion_r2216026026
##
Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -167,7 +167,10 @@ recursive = "0.1.1"
regex = "1.8"
rstest = "0.25.0"
serde_json = "1"
-sqlparser = { version = "0.55.0", default-featur
alamb commented on issue #1886:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1886#issuecomment-3089472631
We have a release candidate out for voting:
- https://lists.apache.org/thread/88ptk90hkch48x7bx2ny87zggxokgxxp
Thanks to @crepererum for approving the changelo
iffyio commented on code in PR #1927:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1927#discussion_r2216110543
##
tests/sqlparser_common.rs:
##
@@ -16031,6 +16031,30 @@ fn parse_create_procedure_with_parameter_modes() {
}
}
+#[test]
+fn parse_not_null_sup
jonathanc-n commented on PR #16819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16819#issuecomment-3089640810
Recorded existence join work at #16820
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
jonathanc-n commented on issue #16820:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16820#issuecomment-3089643159
@2010YOUY01 This can be marked as a good first issue, lets new contributors
for joins to learn more about the different types.
--
This is an automated message from the Apa
jonathanc-n opened a new issue, #16820:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16820
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
@2010YOUY01 adds a benchmark for #16819.
We want to use this to test existence join performance as well.
### Desc
fmonjalet commented on code in PR #16816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16816#discussion_r2216291759
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/array_agg.rs:
##
@@ -1008,8 +1002,7 @@ mod tests {
acc2.update_batch(&[data(["b", "c", "a"])])?;
acc1 = m
comphead commented on code in PR #16816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16816#discussion_r2216297987
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/array_agg.rs:
##
@@ -315,11 +313,7 @@ impl Accumulator for ArrayAggAccumulator {
};
if !val.is_empty() {
UBarney commented on code in PR #16819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16819#discussion_r2216202985
##
benchmarks/src/nlj.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements. See the
ding-young opened a new pull request, #16814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16814
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #16720 .
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these change
ryanschneider commented on PR #1927:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1927#issuecomment-3089851700
Sorry I should've mentioned that I did check the other ColumnOptions and
confirmed that they don't _need_ to use `parse_column_option_expr` but after
thinking about
ryanschneider commented on PR #1927:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1927#issuecomment-3089916338
Ok, I consolidated the tests, fixed the `cargo doc` error and use
`parse_column_option_expr` in all spots for consistency.
--
This is an automated message from th
GitHub user alamb added a comment to the discussion: Best practices for
memory-efficient deduplication of pre-sorted Parquet files
> The query plan for the original query:
So this query is ordered like
```sql
WITH ORDER (col_1 ASC, col_2 ASC)
```
But the grouping is on all columns
```sql
parthchandra commented on issue #2035:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2035#issuecomment-3090174632
Thank you for trying to add Comet to Clickbench!
Your configuration looks ok. The distribution of memory between heap and
off-heap is a little tricky and really
2010YOUY01 opened a new pull request, #16819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16819
## Which issue does this PR close?
- NA
## Rationale for this change
Now, NLJ operator still has some room to improve performance and efficiency
(less memor
colinmarc commented on PR #16750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16750#issuecomment-3089114038
The doc tests were fiddly, sorry about that. I got them to pass locally now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
Dimchikkk commented on code in PR #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16456#discussion_r2215987842
##
Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -167,7 +167,10 @@ recursive = "0.1.1"
regex = "1.8"
rstest = "0.25.0"
serde_json = "1"
-sqlparser = { version = "0.55.0", default-feature
alamb commented on PR #16681:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16681#issuecomment-3089418586
> remove default implementation of equality -- this is a breaking change
As long as we sufficiently document how to fix it (with an example in the
upgrade guide) I I think that m
alamb merged PR #1955:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1955
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
alamb merged PR #16804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16804
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
m09526 opened a new pull request, #16818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16818
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #16817
## Rationale for this change
Minor documentation clean-up.
## Are there any user-facing changes?
No
akoshchiy commented on PR #16790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16790#issuecomment-3089036776
I've added some comments to the docs.
btw, I've checked behaviour on duckdb, and it looks more clearly - there is
no prefixes at all. Maybe we can do the same?
```
alamb commented on code in PR #1954:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1954#discussion_r2215910483
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ pub enum Expr {
/// `[ NOT ] IN (SELECT ...)`
InSubquery {
expr: Box,
-subquery: Box
alamb closed pull request #1954: [branch-0.56] Fix `limit` in subqueries (#1899)
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1954
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
alamb commented on PR #1899:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1899#issuecomment-3089305218
I tried to backport this code to 0.56.0 and I think it is not "semver"
compatible (we need to release this as 0.57.0). I will do so
See more details on
- https://
alamb commented on code in PR #1954:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1954#discussion_r2215910483
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ pub enum Expr {
/// `[ NOT ] IN (SELECT ...)`
InSubquery {
expr: Box,
-subquery: Box
alamb closed issue #1952: Release sqlparser 0.56.1 (backport/fix release)
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1952
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
alamb commented on issue #1952:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1952#issuecomment-3089318514
It turns out backporting
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1898 would break other
users (it changes the AST and this is not SemVer compatible wi
alamb opened a new pull request, #1954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1954
- Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1952
- Backport of https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1899 to
0.56.0 branch
--
This is an
alamb commented on code in PR #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16456#discussion_r2215925032
##
Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -167,7 +167,10 @@ recursive = "0.1.1"
regex = "1.8"
rstest = "0.25.0"
serde_json = "1"
-sqlparser = { version = "0.55.0", default-features =
alamb commented on issue #1886:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1886#issuecomment-3089328424
I am working on creating a 0.58 release now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
alamb opened a new pull request, #1955:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1955
- Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1886
You can see the rendered changelog here:
-
https://github.com/alamb/sqlparser-rs/blob/alamb/prepare_0.58
alamb commented on issue #1886:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1886#issuecomment-3089344281
I have prepared a PR with version update and changelog:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1955
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
alamb opened a new issue, #1956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1956
Follow on to
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1886
This ticket tracks creating the next sqlparser release (mostly so others can
follow along)
**Targ
iffyio merged PR #1945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1945
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
yoavcloud opened a new pull request, #1957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1957
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
iffyio commented on code in PR #1947:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1947#discussion_r2216085532
##
src/ast/ddl.rs:
##
@@ -351,6 +351,10 @@ pub enum AlterTableOperation {
ValidateConstraint {
name: Ident,
},
+/// `SET ( storag
alamb merged PR #16818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16818
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #16817: Minor documentation fix in parquet_index.rs
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16817
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
Omega359 commented on issue #16235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3090345846
Skeleton of a blog post started with what I think are the highlights. feel
free to edit/etc
https://github.com/Omega359/datafusion-site/blob/df_49/content/blog/2025-07-2
alamb commented on issue #16235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3090337698
I created a branch and will now create a PR there to update the version and
changelog
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/branch-49
--
This is an automated message fr
alamb commented on issue #16235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3090333269
Thanks @xudong963 -- I am beginning the process now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
timsaucer opened a new issue, #16821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16821
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
During my own creation of table providers for a custom data source, I ran
into cases where I could gain significant performance b
alamb opened a new pull request, #16822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16822
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235
## Rationale for this change
We are preparing for a release so we need to update th
alamb commented on code in PR #16539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16539#discussion_r2216741569
##
datafusion/common/src/scalar/mod.rs:
##
@@ -3075,38 +3075,7 @@ impl ScalarValue {
target_type: &DataType,
cast_options: &CastOptions<'static>,
alamb closed pull request #70: WIP Blog post for Datafusion 47.0.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/70
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
alamb commented on PR #70:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/70#issuecomment-3090472238
@Omega359 did it for real here:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/83
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log o
93 matches
Mail list logo
