dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #15759:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15759
Bumps [clap](https://github.com/clap-rs/clap) from 4.5.35 to 4.5.36.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/releases";>clap's releases.
v4.5.36
[4.5.
xudong963 merged PR #15759:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15759
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
milenkovicm commented on issue #627:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/627#issuecomment-2814076120
Web UI is not part of core ballista, closing this issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
xudong963 commented on PR #15746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15746#issuecomment-2815275392
> > I don't find SQL in the file that has the following pattern
>
> They sometimes might have after a optimization rule that adds one extra
projection? Not sure if that happe
xudong963 opened a new issue, #15762:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15762
### Describe the bug
```
Benchmarking physical_plan_clickbench_q50: Warming up for 3. s
thread 'main' panicked at datafusion/core/benches/sql_planner.rs:60:14:
called `Result::unwr
2010YOUY01 opened a new issue, #15760:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15760
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
The common NLJ implementation consumes constant memory. However,
DataFusion's implementation is optimized for execution time, wh
xudong963 commented on PR #15746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15746#issuecomment-281524
Thank you for your review, let's go and continue to optimize.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
xudong963 commented on PR #15746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15746#issuecomment-2815109693
> > > sql planner benchmarks
> >
> >
> > Do we have some existing sql planner benchmarks?
>
> Yes, there is a sql_planner bench.
https://github.com/apache/datafusi
andygrove opened a new pull request, #1657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1657
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## How are these changes
andygrove commented on code in PR #1657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1657#discussion_r2050730872
##
docs/source/user-guide/compatibility.md:
##
@@ -93,104 +97,104 @@ Cast operations in Comet fall into three levels of
support:
- **Compatible**: The re
andygrove commented on code in PR #1657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1657#discussion_r2050731258
##
docs/source/user-guide/compatibility.md:
##
@@ -40,19 +40,23 @@ Comet currently has three distinct implementations of the
Parquet scan operator.
| `nati
andygrove commented on code in PR #1657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1657#discussion_r2050729883
##
docs/source/user-guide/compatibility.md:
##
@@ -40,19 +40,23 @@ Comet currently has three distinct implementations of the
Parquet scan operator.
| `nati
andygrove commented on PR #1655:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1655#issuecomment-2813894419
I'm seeing a number of failures like this:
```
2025-04-17T19:12:54.7914570Z - columnar shuffle on struct including nulls
*** FAILED *** (352 milliseconds)
2025-04-
mbutrovich commented on code in PR #1657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1657#discussion_r2050734119
##
docs/source/user-guide/compatibility.md:
##
@@ -40,19 +40,23 @@ Comet currently has three distinct implementations of the
Parquet scan operator.
| `nat
timsaucer opened a new pull request, #1107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1107
# Which issue does this PR close?
None
# Rationale for this change
DataFusion 47 is updating upstream.
# What changes are included in this PR?
Mostly smal
etseidl commented on issue #15742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15742#issuecomment-2815595171
BTW, this issue is somewhat tied up with
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/221. Take for example
```sql
> select * from 'parquet-testing/data/float16_nonzeros_a
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #15380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15380#discussion_r2050341651
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -662,53 +665,152 @@ impl ExternalSorter {
let elapsed_compute = metrics.elapsed_compute().clone()
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #15628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15628#issuecomment-2814936184
> [@alamb](https://github.com/alamb)
>
> I think a SortMergeJoin derivative that handles inequality could be
helpful here but there are comments that SortMergeJoin is n
alamb commented on PR #15746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15746#issuecomment-2814089929
🤖: Benchmark completed
Details
```
Comparing HEAD and speed_up_optimize_projection
Benchmark clickbench_extended.json
-
xudong963 commented on PR #15746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15746#issuecomment-2814864380
> sql planner benchmarks
Do we have some existing sql planner benchmarks?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
Dandandan commented on code in PR #15380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15380#discussion_r2050293912
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -662,53 +665,152 @@ impl ExternalSorter {
let elapsed_compute = metrics.elapsed_compute().clone();
Dandandan commented on code in PR #15380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15380#discussion_r2050295792
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -662,53 +665,152 @@ impl ExternalSorter {
let elapsed_compute = metrics.elapsed_compute().clone();
milenkovicm closed issue #1239: Issue with partitioned `ListingTable`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1239
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comme
Dandandan commented on code in PR #15380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15380#discussion_r2050297829
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -662,53 +665,152 @@ impl ExternalSorter {
let elapsed_compute = metrics.elapsed_compute().clone();
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #15628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15628#issuecomment-2815082026
I think https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15760 is needed to fix
the issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message
adriangb commented on issue #15512:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15512#issuecomment-2814538954
@acking-you have you seen https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15301?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log o
Dandandan commented on code in PR #15380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15380#discussion_r2050293912
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -662,53 +665,152 @@ impl ExternalSorter {
let elapsed_compute = metrics.elapsed_compute().clone();
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #15380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15380#discussion_r2050395194
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -662,53 +665,152 @@ impl ExternalSorter {
let elapsed_compute = metrics.elapsed_compute().clone()
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #15380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15380#issuecomment-2815067483
> Thanks @zhuqi-lucas for sticking to this issue!
>
> I think we're close to have a PR that can be merged that improved sort
performance and gets some good insights for whe
xudong963 commented on PR #15746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15746#issuecomment-2815281930
> > > I don't find SQL in the file that has the following pattern
> >
> >
> > They sometimes might have after a optimization rule that adds one extra
projection? Not sure
jayzhan211 opened a new issue, #15758:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15758
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
We can see Debug format in this explain statement, turn it to Display format
would be nice for readability
```
Ok(Fiel
parthchandra merged PR #1656:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1656
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
iffyio commented on code in PR #1809:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1809#discussion_r2050229485
##
tests/sqlparser_mssql.rs:
##
@@ -2053,3 +2054,171 @@ fn parse_drop_trigger() {
}
);
}
+
+#[test]
+fn parse_mssql_go_keyword() {
+l
kumarlokesh commented on issue #14363:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14363#issuecomment-2814836741
@phisn @alamb made an attempt to address this requirement here:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15757. Please have a look.
--
This is an automated message from t
xudong963 commented on PR #15746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15746#issuecomment-2814871592
> > sql planner benchmarks
>
> Do we have some existing sql planner benchmarks?
Also, there is a real production case:
 changed it to concatenate all buil
xudong963 merged PR #15749:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15749
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
Dandandan commented on PR #15746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15746#issuecomment-2815265485
> I don't find SQL in the file that has the following pattern
They sometimes might have after a optimization rule that adds one extra
projection? Not sure if that happens in
timsaucer commented on code in PR #15646:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15646#discussion_r2050653344
##
datafusion/core/tests/user_defined/user_defined_scalar_functions.rs:
##
@@ -1367,3 +1370,346 @@ async fn register_alltypes_parquet(ctx:
&SessionContext) -> R
timsaucer commented on code in PR #15646:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15646#discussion_r2050650946
##
datafusion/expr/src/udf.rs:
##
@@ -293,9 +293,11 @@ where
/// Arguments passed to [`ScalarUDFImpl::invoke_with_args`] when invoking a
/// scalar function.
timsaucer commented on code in PR #15646:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15646#discussion_r2050662012
##
datafusion/core/tests/user_defined/user_defined_scalar_functions.rs:
##
@@ -1367,3 +1370,346 @@ async fn register_alltypes_parquet(ctx:
&SessionContext) -> R
timsaucer commented on code in PR #15646:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15646#discussion_r2050655982
##
datafusion/core/tests/user_defined/user_defined_scalar_functions.rs:
##
@@ -1367,3 +1370,346 @@ async fn register_alltypes_parquet(ctx:
&SessionContext) -> R
Dandandan commented on PR #15746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15746#issuecomment-2815034641
> > sql planner benchmarks
>
> Do we have some existing sql planner benchmarks?
Yes, there is a sql_planner bench.
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/main/d
milenkovicm merged PR #1243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1243
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubsc
andygrove commented on PR #1626:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1626#issuecomment-2815592279
@anuragmantri fyi, I alread had this PR open from a while back. It does not
resolve the issue but seems worth merging while we work on figuring out a test
approach.
--
This
andygrove commented on code in PR #1657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1657#discussion_r2050747143
##
docs/source/user-guide/compatibility.md:
##
@@ -40,19 +40,23 @@ Comet currently has three distinct implementations of the
Parquet scan operator.
| `nati
timsaucer commented on PR #1100:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1100#issuecomment-2815615744
I'm sorry I haven't had time to look through it until now. **This looks
incredible!**
I want to take some time to play with it myself before I hit approve. Thank
you s
milenkovicm commented on issue #455:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/455#issuecomment-2815668613
I believe this can be closed, we do publish images to GitHub packages and
docker hub
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
milenkovicm closed issue #455: Publish official Docker images as part of
release process
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/455
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
milenkovicm merged PR #1240:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1240
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubsc
milenkovicm merged PR #1230:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1230
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubsc
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1244
Bumps [crossbeam-channel](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam) from
0.5.14 to 0.5.15.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/releases";
milenkovicm closed issue #1205: Add support for S3 Object Store to
scheduler/executor binaries
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1205
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
timsaucer closed pull request #1104: Testing DF 47 before release cut
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1104
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
milenkovicm merged PR #1237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1237
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubsc
milenkovicm closed issue #1238: pluggable task distribution policies
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1238
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
milenkovicm closed issue #19: Ballista: Implement configuration mechanism
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/19
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
kumarlokesh commented on PR #15644:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15644#issuecomment-2815675711
@comphead updated the PR after resolving merge conflicts.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
comphead commented on code in PR #1657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1657#discussion_r2050792116
##
docs/source/user-guide/compatibility.md:
##
@@ -34,25 +34,36 @@ This guide offers information about areas of functionality
where there are known
Comet cu
milenkovicm commented on issue #888:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/888#issuecomment-2815650611
closing this as #1243 exposed some way to extend task scheduling, if more is
needed happy to discuss and open new issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apa
milenkovicm opened a new issue, #1245:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1245
Following the completion of #1068, it's time to propose the next steps for
Ballista.
In the short term, I would like to focus on the following areas:
- **Improving test coverag
milenkovicm commented on issue #1068:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1068#issuecomment-2815711646
After epic 6 months, I'm closing this issue. I would propose to have further
discussion about ballista in #1245
Thank you everyone for your help, support and c
milenkovicm closed issue #1068: [EPIC]: Ballista Reloaded, Roadmap Proposal
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1068
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
adriangb opened a new pull request, #15764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15764
Adds support for dictionaries to pruning predicate.
I encountered this when feeding in a stats schema with dictionary encoded
columns.
I see no reason we can't support this.
--
This is a
milenkovicm commented on issue #19:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/19#issuecomment-2815671096
I believe this has been done in #1099
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
milenkovicm merged PR #1244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1244
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubsc
milenkovicm commented on issue #416:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/416#issuecomment-2814090040
Etch has been removed, closing this issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
kevinjqliu commented on issue #15751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15751#issuecomment-2813294681
cc @alamb i found this while looking into how datafusion was added to
homebrew, as per https://github.com/clflushopt/tpchgen-rs/pull/121
--
This is an automated message fro
Standing-Man commented on issue #15758:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15758#issuecomment-2815019499
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #15380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15380#discussion_r2050384125
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -662,53 +665,152 @@ impl ExternalSorter {
let elapsed_compute = metrics.elapsed_compute().clone()
mbutrovich opened a new issue, #15763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15763
### Describe the bug
The logic that coerces timestamps to a different resolution iterates through
fields and uses their key in the Parquet schema as a key to match against the
Arrow schema.
milenkovicm commented on PR #1230:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1230#issuecomment-2815461468
Thanks @joaoferrao
I agree with you. As a follow up I will try to enable s3 in default context,
once i merge few other PRs. Will look into improving doc as well.
timsaucer closed pull request #15728: Return field instead of datatype for
`return_type_from_args`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15728
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
shruti2522 commented on issue #15760:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15760#issuecomment-2815464344
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
timsaucer commented on PR #15646:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15646#issuecomment-2815465523
I've been working through switching over to returning field instead of data
type. This had many touch points. The PR has grown very large, but a
significant portion of that is upda
kumarlokesh opened a new pull request, #15757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15757
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #14363.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
This PR adds a new `Joi
iffyio merged PR #1811:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1811
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
lovasoa opened a new pull request, #1817:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1817
adds support for xmltable(...)
see
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/functions-xml.html#FUNCTIONS-XML-PROCESSING
fixes https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/i
Standing-Man commented on issue #15698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15698#issuecomment-2816406328
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
milenkovicm closed issue #888: Expose the lower level scheduler API
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/888
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
Adez017 commented on PR #66:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/66#issuecomment-2815810736
> Thanks @Adez017 ! Let's give it another day or two for any remaining
comments and then I'll plan to publish it
I think now , we should move forward
--
This is an automated
aharpervc commented on code in PR #1809:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1809#discussion_r2050843298
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -4054,6 +4054,12 @@ pub enum Statement {
arguments: Vec,
options: Vec,
},
+/// Go (MSSQL)
+//
qstommyshu commented on issue #12342:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/12342#issuecomment-2812968577
Oh I see, thanks @Omega359 for sending the doc.
Hope you don't mind me asking another question. I'm still wondering why we
want DF to support operations like `select t
milenkovicm opened a new pull request, #1247:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1247
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
# Rationale for this change
object store creation will print configuration with secret key at INFO log
level, w
andygrove commented on issue #1245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1245#issuecomment-2816157686
There has been a lot of progress with shuffle performance in Comet that
Ballista could benefit from.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
andygrove commented on code in PR #15168:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15168#discussion_r2051099886
##
datafusion/spark/src/function/math/expm1.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor licen
milenkovicm commented on issue #1245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1245#issuecomment-2816167845
I would take shuffle related task with highest priority @andygrove
was thinking of #320 and few others related to compression, schema
serialization and so on, but
andygrove commented on issue #1245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1245#issuecomment-2816170438
There is work in progress to add a `datafusion-spark` crate in the core
DataFusion repo. See https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5600 and
https://github.com/ap
Dandandan commented on code in PR #15768:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15768#discussion_r2051062202
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/repartition/mod.rs:
##
@@ -298,25 +299,15 @@ impl BatchPartitioner {
.into_iter()
milenkovicm commented on issue #1245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1245#issuecomment-2816176772
would be happy to help. will have a look at comet
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a
adriangb commented on PR #15697:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15697#issuecomment-2816181258
FYI @Dandandan although very rough I put up a draft of filter pushdown in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15770.
The interaction with this PR is something to think a
jayzhan211 commented on issue #15756:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15756#issuecomment-2815340158
`╦` should be utf8. what error did you get
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
andygrove commented on PR #1655:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1655#issuecomment-2815370919
@parthchandra @mbutrovich Ths PR is now ready for review
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
shruti2522 commented on code in PR #15468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15468#discussion_r2050599634
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/aggregate.slt:
##
@@ -4969,6 +4969,25 @@ select count(distinct column1), count(distinct column2)
from dict_test group by
milenkovicm commented on issue #890:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/890#issuecomment-2815561069
There is ongoing discussion about support of table formats in #1241 if
anybody interested
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
etseidl commented on issue #15742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15742#issuecomment-2815571292
More background in #3377 and #3442. It seems like additional data types were
planned, but abandoned for some reason.
@alamb do you think it would be safe to replace the lo
xudong963 commented on code in PR #15735:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15735#discussion_r2048178156
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/simplify_expressions/expr_simplifier.rs:
##
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ impl ExprSimplifier {
/// assert_eq!(expr, b_lt_2);
/// ```
berkaysynnada commented on code in PR #15566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15566#discussion_r2049226852
##
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/push_down_filter.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,535 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more con
clflushopt commented on issue #14608:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14608#issuecomment-2811379764
In order to try and make progress on this, I decided to go with having a
single function that builds all tables for a single scale factor similar to how
DuckDB does it. My re
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
