g3blv commented on issue #15136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15136#issuecomment-2712910534
I've tried a couple of potential workarounds without success:
1. Using explicit casting in the query:
```sql
SELECT sources.id, media.title FROM sources JOIN media ON
iffyio commented on code in PR #1762:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1762#discussion_r1988447089
##
src/parser/mod.rs:
##
@@ -8002,6 +8002,11 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
&& dialect_of!(self is MySqlDialect | GenericDialect)
alan910127 commented on issue #15088:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15088#issuecomment-2713273281
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
Blizzara commented on PR #15123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15123#issuecomment-2713329924
Yeah, from my perspective this one isn't so bad - implementing any of the
deprecated methods is kinda okay, since the defaults are wired to propagate the
call correctly here. Callin
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #15147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15147
Bumps [syn](https://github.com/dtolnay/syn) from 2.0.98 to 2.0.100.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/releases";>syn's
releases.
2.0.100
Add
vadimpiven commented on PR #15124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15124#issuecomment-2713103636
Tests failed because of “no space left on device” error. Can someone please
restart it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
EmilyMatt opened a new issue, #1495:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1495
### Describe the bug
The ShuffleRepartitioner should be the memory consumer registered with the
pool, with each partitionbuffer being a reservation split off from it(using
new_empty()), s
EmilyMatt opened a new pull request, #1496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1496
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #1495 .
## Rationale for this change
It lets MemoryPools have a better grasp of the amount of operators actually
runnin
alamb commented on issue #13814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13814#issuecomment-2713604463
One thing that is strange is that we have moved most of the code out of
datafusion-core now.
I am still hoping we can get
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/main/dat
alamb opened a new pull request, #15156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15156
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15155
## Rationale for this change
The coverage for feature flags needs to be improved,
alamb commented on issue #5621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5621#issuecomment-2714136904
Will bo covered by https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15155
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
alamb closed issue #5621: Cannot compile datafusion without feature
regex_expressions
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5621
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
alan910127 commented on PR #15110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15110#issuecomment-2714179107
@findepi so the test cases in `unwrap_cast` are not correct, and they're
showing that I'm over-unwrapping. Am I understanding this correctly?
--
This is an automated message fro
tustvold commented on issue #15162:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15162#issuecomment-2714823206
I'm not familiar with how comet interops with Spark, but it looks like
whatever component is wrapping the spark execution is incorrectly exposing the
schema of its outputs? Pro
comphead commented on issue #15162:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15162#issuecomment-2714869946
Thanks @tustvold the requirement is to customize hardcoded inner field for
ListType which is hardcoded `item` now.
So DF and arrow-rs creates data arrays for ListType
```
andygrove merged PR #83:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/pull/83
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafu
andygrove closed issue #81: TPC-H benchmark does not run q15
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/issues/81
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
andygrove opened a new issue, #1500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1500
### What is the problem the feature request solves?
This issue is to track splitting out the read-side padding changes from
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1482/files#diff-
tustvold commented on issue #15162:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15162#issuecomment-2714900060
> Comet using the DataFusion physical plan expressions directly, there is no
coercion phase and schema from Apache Spark for the same comes as
IMO this is the issue, the
Omega359 commented on code in PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1989463073
##
content/blog/2025-03-11-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Using Ordering for Better Plans in Apache DataFusion
+date: 2025-0
Weijun-H commented on code in PR #15123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15123#discussion_r1987269201
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/projection_pushdown.rs:
##
@@ -89,6 +92,10 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for DummyUDF {
fn return_type(&self, _arg_types:
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1496:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1496#issuecomment-2714806221
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1496?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
comphead opened a new issue, #15162:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15162
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
In Apache DataFusion Comet during implementation to handle ARRAY types from
Apache Spark it was found that the inner field hardcod
alan910127 commented on issue #15088:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15088#issuecomment-2714819886
I've tried
- this:
```rust
fn required_input_distribution(&self) -> Vec {
vec![Distribution::UnspecifiedDistribution]
}
fn benef
comphead commented on issue #15162:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15162#issuecomment-2714809741
@alamb @tustvold appreciate if you can chime in
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
timsaucer commented on issue #15157:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15157#issuecomment-2714808637
Recommend adding to this issue that we will want to re-enable the `Check
datafusion-proto (json)` as part of closing the issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apach
goldmedal commented on PR #15123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15123#issuecomment-2711195715
Should we remove the deprecated UDF API now? According to our [API health
policy](https://datafusion.apache.org/contributor-guide/api-health.html#deprecation-guidelines):
```
irenjj commented on code in PR #15140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15140#discussion_r1989258369
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort_preserving_merge.rs:
##
@@ -186,8 +186,15 @@ impl DisplayAs for SortPreservingMergeExec {
Ok(())
irenjj commented on code in PR #15140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15140#discussion_r1989258369
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort_preserving_merge.rs:
##
@@ -186,8 +186,15 @@ impl DisplayAs for SortPreservingMergeExec {
Ok(())
irenjj commented on code in PR #15140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15140#discussion_r1989268937
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort_preserving_merge.rs:
##
@@ -186,8 +186,15 @@ impl DisplayAs for SortPreservingMergeExec {
Ok(())
alamb commented on code in PR #15156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15156#discussion_r1989216255
##
.github/workflows/rust.yml:
##
@@ -66,9 +66,12 @@ jobs:
# the changes to `Cargo.lock` after building with the updated
manifest.
cargo check
blaginin commented on issue #15128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15128#issuecomment-2714441462
> Perhaps we can simply throw an error
I've been thinking about https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15159 -
arguably a dirty fix, but I can't come up with anything
alamb commented on PR #13672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13672#issuecomment-2714438025
I merged up to resolve conflicts and plan to merge this when the tests pass
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
Omega359 commented on issue #15151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15151#issuecomment-2714279380
Seems reasonable to me
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
alamb opened a new issue, #15157:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15157
### Describe the bug
I am not sure what the `json` feature is supposed to do in datafusion-proto
but it is broken
### To Reproduce
```shell
cargo check --profile ci --all-targets
alamb commented on PR #15102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15102#issuecomment-2714390818
Filed a ticket to track adding coverage
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15158
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
alamb closed issue #15150: regression: DataFusion 46 wasm compile error with
parquet
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15150
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
alamb closed issue #15122: Serde feature is broken
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15122
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
alamb commented on code in PR #15156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15156#discussion_r1989360930
##
.github/workflows/rust.yml:
##
@@ -79,28 +82,68 @@ jobs:
uses: ./.github/actions/setup-builder
with:
rust-version: stable
- - na
alamb merged PR #15124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15124
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #15124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15124#issuecomment-2714425431
Thanks again @vadimpiven and @Weijun-H
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
Weijun-H commented on code in PR #15109:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15109#discussion_r1989434623
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/stream.rs:
##
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ impl ReceiverStreamBuilder {
// the JoinSet were aborted, which in
irenjj commented on code in PR #15140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15140#discussion_r1989258369
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort_preserving_merge.rs:
##
@@ -186,8 +186,15 @@ impl DisplayAs for SortPreservingMergeExec {
Ok(())
alamb commented on code in PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1989412400
##
content/blog/2025-03-05-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Analysis of Ordering for Better Plans
+date: 2025-03-05
+author: Must
Omega359 commented on code in PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1989461842
##
content/blog/2025-03-11-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Using Ordering for Better Plans in Apache DataFusion
+date: 2025-0
Omega359 commented on code in PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1989464583
##
content/blog/2025-03-11-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Using Ordering for Better Plans in Apache DataFusion
+date: 2025-0
Omega359 commented on code in PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1989466124
##
content/blog/2025-03-11-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Using Ordering for Better Plans in Apache DataFusion
+date: 2025-0
Omega359 commented on code in PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1989467404
##
content/blog/2025-03-11-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Using Ordering for Better Plans in Apache DataFusion
+date: 2025-0
alamb commented on PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#issuecomment-2714590589
Thank you so much @akurmustafa and @ozankabak -- I pushed two commits with
minor changes (spelling/code formatting) and then to update the date to today.
I think this is ready t
Omega359 commented on code in PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1989475539
##
content/blog/2025-03-11-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Using Ordering for Better Plans in Apache DataFusion
+date: 2025-0
Omega359 commented on code in PR #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1989475539
##
content/blog/2025-03-11-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Using Ordering for Better Plans in Apache DataFusion
+date: 2025-0
irenjj opened a new pull request, #15163:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15163
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #15107
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes test
zhuqi-lucas commented on issue #15162:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15162#issuecomment-2714878036
Adding a config to support relax name checking is a good solution to me:
If field A and field B only the name is different, but we only check other
part besides name,
MohamedAbdeen21 commented on code in PR #1757:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1757#discussion_r1988708402
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -6148,12 +6218,12 @@ impl fmt::Display for GrantObjects {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, Ord, Hash
mbrobbel opened a new pull request, #15148:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15148
## Which issue does this PR close?
Remove the `humantime` dependency via `env_logger`
(https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0014.html)
To remove it fully we need https://github.c
Satyam018 closed pull request #15109: #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is
not an internal error
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15109
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
alamb commented on issue #13814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13814#issuecomment-2713644414
I also tried removing all the doctests from lib.rs and that didn't help (I
didn't expect it to but I wanted to try)
```diff
diff --git a/datafusion/core/src/lib.rs b/data
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #15088:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15088#issuecomment-2713675854
> Hi [@2010YOUY01](https://github.com/2010YOUY01),
>
> I've taken a look into this and found that the issue seems to be more
related to `SortExec` itself rather than th
dpengpeng opened a new issue, #1499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1499
### What is the problem the feature request solves?
I compiled the source code of Comet release 0.6.0 on the Ubuntu (18.04.4
LTS) operating system, obtaining a `comet-spark-spark3.4_2.12-0
zhuqi-lucas opened a new pull request, #15152:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15152
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes sub-task topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view
for
[#15096](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1509
chenkovsky opened a new pull request, #15153:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15153
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #15118.
## Rationale for this change
In sql_compound_field_access_to_expr, datafusion doesn't check whether
prefix can be merged
chenkovsky commented on issue #15127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15127#issuecomment-2713894092
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
alamb commented on code in PR #15119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15119#discussion_r1989022172
##
datafusion/core/src/execution/context/mod.rs:
##
@@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ impl FunctionRegistry for SessionContext {
}
fn expr_planners(&self) -> Vec> {
MohamedAbdeen21 commented on code in PR #1757:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1757#discussion_r1989297099
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -6148,12 +6218,12 @@ impl fmt::Display for GrantObjects {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, Ord, Hash
alamb commented on PR #15102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15102#issuecomment-2714391440
Thanks again @XiangpengHao
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
jonahgao commented on code in PR #15120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15120#discussion_r1989378352
##
datafusion/expr/src/expr_schema.rs:
##
@@ -343,7 +343,17 @@ impl ExprSchemable for Expr {
fn metadata(&self, schema: &dyn ExprSchema) -> Result> {
alamb commented on PR #15110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15110#issuecomment-2714477098
(thank you for checking this @findepi -- 🙏
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
findepi commented on code in PR #15110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15110#discussion_r1989510726
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/simplify_expressions/unwrap_cast.rs:
##
@@ -177,6 +192,45 @@ pub(super) fn
is_cast_expr_and_support_unwrap_cast_in_comparison_for_inli
andygrove commented on issue #1420:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1420#issuecomment-2714702417
I'd like to create the release candidate sometime this week.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
blaginin opened a new pull request, #15159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15159
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15128
## Rationale for this change
We currently override source losing some data, see iss
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #15104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15104#discussion_r1989511048
##
datafusion/common/src/config.rs:
##
@@ -252,6 +252,11 @@ config_namespace! {
/// string length and thus DataFusion can not enforce such limits.
alan910127 commented on PR #15110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15110#issuecomment-2714725299
> As in only do the rewrite if the sequence
>
> - cast to int
> - cast (back) to string
>
> results in the exact same string as went int
@alamb I found that
cj-zhukov closed pull request #15154: Statistics: Migrate to Distribution from
Precision (#14896)
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15154
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
comphead merged PR #15146:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15146
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
mvzink commented on code in PR #1762:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1762#discussion_r1989712091
##
src/parser/mod.rs:
##
@@ -8002,6 +8002,11 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
&& dialect_of!(self is MySqlDialect | GenericDialect)
tustvold commented on issue #15162:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15162#issuecomment-2715020448
> Arrow-rs is not very configurable unlike to DataFusion
If you have a concrete proposal, feel free to raise an issue. FWIW most
kernels do take various options to alter
parthchandra commented on code in PR #1491:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1491#discussion_r1989718327
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/comet/CometPlanStabilitySuite.scala:
##
@@ -278,7 +278,6 @@ trait CometPlanStabilitySuite extends
DisableAda
parthchandra commented on PR #1494:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1494#issuecomment-2715024318
@mbutrovich, @comphead if you could please review
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
alan910127 commented on PR #15110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15110#issuecomment-2715045737
@findepi sorry I didn't notice your comment and I just pushed a new version
with the unwrapping logic deleted.
So you think the two optimizations **should** coexist?
SanjayUG opened a new pull request, #15164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15164
Hi there,
checkout this pr on #15126 issue,
document unique identifiers in MemoryConsumer and MemoryReservation.
The unique identifier functionality was already implemented but no
eliaperantoni commented on code in PR #15143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15143#discussion_r1988585977
##
datafusion/sql/tests/cases/diagnostic.rs:
##
@@ -286,3 +286,121 @@ fn test_invalid_function() -> Result<()> {
assert_eq!(diag.span, Some(spans["whole
irenjj commented on PR #15125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15125#issuecomment-2712119745
Thank you for helping me revise the question! @alamb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
alamb closed issue #15020: Do not print logical plans in `tree` explain format
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15020
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
xudong963 commented on issue #15136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15136#issuecomment-2713618560
Could you please directly use datafusion-cli to create these two tables and
execute join to see what happens?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
Satyam018 closed pull request #15109: #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is
not an internal error
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15109
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
alamb closed issue #14193: Substrait support for propagating TableScan.filters
to Substrait ReadRel
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14193
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
joroKr21 commented on code in PR #10790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10790#discussion_r1988683281
##
datafusion/functions-array/src/make_array.rs:
##
@@ -131,6 +131,11 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for MakeArray {
}
}
+// Empty array is a special case that is
zhuqi-lucas commented on issue #15096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15096#issuecomment-2713415370
New sub_task:
- [ ] topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
Standing-Man commented on code in PR #15082:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15082#discussion_r1989151892
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/explain_tree.slt:
##
@@ -539,6 +539,158 @@ physical_plan
17)│ format: arrow │
18)└
alamb opened a new issue, #15155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15155
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
DataFusion has many rust features (e.g. `--features=parquet`) and recently
we hit discovered several failures for features during ref
eliaperantoni commented on issue #14438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14438#issuecomment-2713064816
> > Just one minor thing: it seems like there are scalar subqueries and then
"in" subqueries. e.g. SELECT * FROM users WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM admins).
Do you think yo
goldmedal merged PR #15068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15068
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
goldmedal commented on PR #15068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15068#issuecomment-2713703765
Thanks @chenkovsky and @alamb for reviewing 👍
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
cj-zhukov opened a new pull request, #15154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15154
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #14896.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes
niebayes commented on issue #15117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15117#issuecomment-2710052300
> btw the equivalent rewrite for the old signature should be
>
> signature: Signature::one_of(
> vec