Re: [PR] feat: use edition 2024 [datafusion-sqlparser-rs]

2025-05-02 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #1736: feat: use edition 2024 URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1736 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific com

Re: [PR] feat: use edition 2024 [datafusion-sqlparser-rs]

2025-04-25 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #1736: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1736#issuecomment-2831740340 Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale label or

Re: [PR] feat: use edition 2024 [datafusion-sqlparser-rs]

2025-02-24 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #1736: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1736#issuecomment-2679691606 > Adding an MSRV sounds good to me! Filed an issue to track: - https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1744 -- This is an automated message from

Re: [PR] feat: use edition 2024 [datafusion-sqlparser-rs]

2025-02-23 Thread via GitHub
iffyio commented on PR #1736: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1736#issuecomment-2677624981 Adding an MSRV sounds good to me! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

Re: [PR] feat: use edition 2024 [datafusion-sqlparser-rs]

2025-02-23 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #1736: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1736#issuecomment-2676808035 🤔 interestingly we don't seem to have an MSRV policy in this crate (at least not that I could find in https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/blob/main/README.md

Re: [PR] feat: use edition 2024 [datafusion-sqlparser-rs]

2025-02-21 Thread via GitHub
iffyio commented on PR #1736: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1736#issuecomment-2674478094 Oh good point, yeah it does look like MSRV is 1.85 for 2024 edition, did a quick test ``` Caused by: feature `edition2024` is required The package requi

Re: [PR] feat: use edition 2024 [datafusion-sqlparser-rs]

2025-02-21 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on code in PR #1736: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1736#discussion_r1965389503 ## Cargo.toml: ## @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ include = [ "Cargo.toml", "LICENSE.TXT", ] -edition = "2021" +edition = "2024" Review Comment: my only

Re: [PR] feat: use edition 2024 [datafusion-sqlparser-rs]

2025-02-20 Thread via GitHub
iajoiner commented on PR #1736: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1736#issuecomment-2673750295 @iffyio Yes! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] feat: use edition 2024 [datafusion-sqlparser-rs]

2025-02-20 Thread via GitHub
iffyio commented on PR #1736: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1736#issuecomment-2673610757 @iajoiner could you take a look at the ci failure? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use