Re: [PR] Update ClickBench queries to avoid to_timestamp_seconds [datafusion]

2025-04-05 Thread via GitHub
acking-you commented on PR #15475: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15475#issuecomment-2762006629 I have also made changes to the query in ClickBench: [clickbench-pr](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/pull/340) @Dandandan @adriangb -- This is an automated messag

Re: [PR] Update ClickBench queries to avoid to_timestamp_seconds [datafusion]

2025-04-04 Thread via GitHub
Dandandan commented on PR #15475: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15475#issuecomment-2762979608 Thank you @acking-you -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] Update ClickBench queries to avoid to_timestamp_seconds [datafusion]

2025-03-28 Thread via GitHub
Dandandan merged PR #15475: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15475 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data

Re: [PR] Update ClickBench queries to avoid to_timestamp_seconds [datafusion]

2025-03-28 Thread via GitHub
adriangb commented on PR #15475: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15475#issuecomment-2762100250 @Dandandan do you think we can merge this here? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL abov

Re: [PR] Update ClickBench queries to avoid to_timestamp_seconds [datafusion]

2025-03-28 Thread via GitHub
adriangb commented on PR #15475: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15475#issuecomment-2761917991 > > Looks good to me. Since we're only ordering by this it shouldn't matter that we order by an integer instead of a proper timestamp, ordering is equivalent. > > Thank you v

Re: [PR] Update ClickBench queries to avoid to_timestamp_seconds [datafusion]

2025-03-28 Thread via GitHub
acking-you commented on PR #15475: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15475#issuecomment-2761888661 > Looks good to me. Since we're only ordering by this it shouldn't matter that we order by an integer instead of a proper timestamp, ordering is equivalent. Thank you very

Re: [PR] Update ClickBench queries to avoid to_timestamp_seconds [datafusion]

2025-03-28 Thread via GitHub
Dandandan commented on PR #15475: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15475#issuecomment-2761610618 > Should we update the same query in the clickbench repo as well? Yes, and we might rerun the queries as well (as `to_timestamp_seconds` takes some time itself as well). --

Re: [PR] Update ClickBench queries to avoid to_timestamp_seconds [datafusion]

2025-03-28 Thread via GitHub
adriangb commented on PR #15475: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15475#issuecomment-2761603385 Should we update the same query in the clickbench repo as well? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and