Re: [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion]

2025-03-17 Thread via GitHub
alamb closed issue #15155: Improved CI test coverage for rust features URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15155 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion]

2025-03-15 Thread via GitHub
blaginin commented on issue #15155: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15155#issuecomment-2727008592 WIP PoC is [here](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15256). The way I think this should work is here: https://github.com/blaginin/datafusion/pull/4#issuecomment-2726555

Re: [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion]

2025-03-11 Thread via GitHub
blaginin commented on issue #15155: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15155#issuecomment-2715411280 I'll play with it 🫡 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion]

2025-03-11 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on issue #15155: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15155#issuecomment-2715406304 > On a related note, maybe we want to reanimate codecov ([#3679](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/3679)) and add a github action to prs? To ensure new code is covered

Re: [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion]

2025-03-11 Thread via GitHub
blaginin commented on issue #15155: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15155#issuecomment-2714674984 On a related note, maybe we want to reanimate codecov (https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/3679) and add a github action to prs? To ensure new code is covered ![I