Re: [I] Add support for lambda/higher order functions [datafusion]

2025-02-08 Thread via GitHub
gstvg commented on issue #14205: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14205#issuecomment-2645957917 take -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [I] Add support for lambda/higher order functions [datafusion]

2025-01-30 Thread via GitHub
rkrishn7 commented on issue #14205: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14205#issuecomment-2625606308 Hi @gstvg! No worries at all, please continue working on it since you've started! Happy to take a look at the work you've done already and give feedback where it makes s

Re: [I] Add support for lambda/higher order functions [datafusion]

2025-01-29 Thread via GitHub
gstvg commented on issue #14205: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14205#issuecomment-2621070075 Lambda syntax only works with databricks dialect, proposed fix here https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1686 -- This is an automated message from the Apache G

Re: [I] Add support for lambda/higher order functions [datafusion]

2025-01-29 Thread via GitHub
gstvg commented on issue #14205: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14205#issuecomment-2621052052 Hi @rkrishn7, have you already started any work? Since creating this issue, I’ve been working on a PoC to refine the proposal, and I managed to get it working. I’d like to c

Re: [I] Add support for lambda/higher order functions [datafusion]

2025-01-26 Thread via GitHub
rkrishn7 commented on issue #14205: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14205#issuecomment-2615024232 Hello! I'm interested in working on this. Agreed that tweaking the existing `ScalarUDF` code would be ideal as it would be least breaking. However, after poking around a